1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one synced 2024-11-10 00:12:09 +00:00
seirdy.one/content/notes/2022-web-almanac-accessibility.md
2022-10-10 21:37:53 -07:00

1.3 KiB
Raw Blame History

title date replyURI replyTitle replyType replyAuthor replyAuthorURI replyAuthorType
Reflections on the 2022 Web Almanacs accessibility findings 2022-10-10T21:37:52-07:00 https://almanac.httparchive.org/en/2022/accessibility Accessibility: The 2022 Web Almnac TechArticle HTTP Archive https://httparchive.org/ Organization

I have a few thoughts on these findings:

  1. The Almanac says skip links commonly skip to the <main> element; I consider [large focusable containers an anti-pattern]({{<relref "/posts/website-best-practices.md#against-focusable-containers">}}) since they ruin keyboard navigability, and recommend skipping to a heading instead.

  2. The Almanac identifies accessible live regions by role="live". I'd suggest also looking into role="feed", which represents a common type of live region.

Some common accessibility issues I'd be interested in for future editions:

  • Contrast that's too high
  • Setting custom foregrounds but not custom backgrounds, and vice versa
  • Removing link underlines
  • Focusable containers
  • Using icon fonts without accessible names

Overall, it's a good look at the small subset of accessibility issues that are automatically detectable (most of which are far less critical than manually-detectable issues).