1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one synced 2024-11-10 08:12:11 +00:00
seirdy.one/content/notes/limited-tracking-consent.md
2022-09-24 11:31:34 -07:00

1.1 KiB

title date replyURI replyTitle replyType replyAuthor replyAuthorURI
Limited tracking and consent 2022-09-24T11:28:34-07:00 https://indieweb.social/@Chronotope/109054613809239268 if the initial collection is very limited it doesn't run afoul of the issues that should require consent SocialMediaPosting Aram Zucker-Scharff https://aramzs.github.io/aramzs/

Assuming data is a liability, how limited should data collection be to not require consent?

I think temporary storage (a week or less) of access logs combined with low-entropy binary information (dark mode, is viewport narrower than what I test with, etc) is reasonable for a small operation. This holds if the data collection is clearly documented in a privacy policy, is Tor-friendly, and obeys signals like GPC. These access logs should exclude high-entropy headers like client hints.

Larger operations should store even less since they have the means to correlate information from many sources. ipscrub comes to mind.

The only long-term storage that should happen without consent is of bot traffic.