mirror of
https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one
synced 2024-11-10 08:12:11 +00:00
1.3 KiB
1.3 KiB
title | date | replyURI | replyTitle | replyType | replyAuthor | replyAuthorURI | replyAuthorType |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reflections on the 2022 Web Almanac’s accessibility findings | 2022-10-10T21:37:52-07:00 | https://almanac.httparchive.org/en/2022/accessibility | Accessibility: The 2022 Web Almnac | TechArticle | HTTP Archive | https://httparchive.org/ | Organization |
I have a few thoughts on these findings:
-
The Almanac says skip links commonly skip to the
<main>
element; I consider [large focusable containers an anti-pattern]({{<relref "/posts/website-best-practices.md#against-focusable-containers">}}) since they ruin keyboard navigability, and recommend skipping to a heading instead. -
The Almanac identifies accessible live regions by
role="live"
. I'd suggest also looking intorole="feed"
, which represents a common type of live region.
Some common accessibility issues I'd be interested in for future editions:
- Contrast that's too high
- Setting custom foregrounds but not custom backgrounds, and vice versa
- Removing link underlines
- Focusable containers
- Using icon fonts without accessible names
Overall, it's a good look at the small subset of accessibility issues that are automatically detectable (most of which are far less critical than manually-detectable issues).