mirror of
https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one
synced 2024-11-24 05:02:10 +00:00
16 lines
940 B
Markdown
16 lines
940 B
Markdown
---
|
|
title: "JS-enabled engines"
|
|
date: 2022-06-02T18:30:30-07:00
|
|
replyURI: "https://archive.today/2022.09.10-195228/https://mk.nixnet.social/notes/911asmc9rn"
|
|
replyTitle: "if search engine crawlers didn't run JavaScript the Web would be better"
|
|
replyType: "SocialMediaPosting"
|
|
replyAuthor: "Alexandra"
|
|
replyAuthorURI: "https://www.alm.website/me"
|
|
---
|
|
The only engines I know of that run JavaScript are Google, Bing, and maybe Petal. None of the other engines in my list appear to support it. I don't even think Yandex does.
|
|
|
|
It's common practice for sites to give a JavaScript-lite version to search engines, though if the content differs heavily you run the risk of hitting a manual action. I'd imagine that search-crawler-exclusive editions would become the norm if crawlers stopped handling JavaScript.
|
|
|
|
Marginalia actually seems to penalize its use.
|
|
|
|
<p><ins>Update: Yep (formerly FairSearch) also seems to evaluate JavaScript</ins></p>
|