mirror of
https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one
synced 2024-12-17 22:32:10 +00:00
114 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
114 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
outputs:
|
|
- html
|
|
title: Site design standards
|
|
description: "The accessibility statement and design standards I hold myself to when creating seirdy.one"
|
|
date: "2022-06-10T00:00:00+00:00"
|
|
---
|
|
This site may look simple on the surface, but I put a _lot_ of thought into it. I hold myself to a long list of requirements concerning accessibility, compatibility, privacy, security, and machine-friendliness.
|
|
|
|
<p role="doc-tip">Note: all references to "pixels" (<abbr title="pixels">px</abbr>) in this section refer to CSS pixels.</p>
|
|
|
|
Accessibility statement
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
I've made every effort to make seirdy.one as accessible as possible. More information about the accessibility-related work for seirdy.one is in my post {{<mention-work>}}{{<cited-work url="https://seirdy.one/posts/2020/11/23/website-best-practices/" name="Best practices for inclusive textual websites" extraName="headline">}}{{</mention-work>}}.
|
|
|
|
### Conformance status
|
|
|
|
The [Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG)](https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/) defines requirements for designers and developers to improve accessibility for people with disabilities. It defines three levels of conformance: Level A, Level AA, and Level AAA. I've made sure seirdy.one is **fully conformant with WCAG 2.2 level AA.**
|
|
|
|
<dfn>Fully conformant</dfn> means that the content fully conforms to the accessibility standard without any exceptions.
|
|
|
|
### Additional accessibility considerations
|
|
|
|
Additionally, I strive to conform to WCAG 2.2 level AAA wherever applicable. I comply with all AAA criteria except for the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
SC 1.4.8 Visual Presentation
|
|
: I am in partial compliance with this criterion. Long article body text for articles should conform; with default browser fonts, they have an average character count per line below 80 characters. However, some lines may occasionally exceed this limit. Text outside of long article bodies has a longer line width, though.
|
|
|
|
SC 2.4.9 Link Purpose (Link Only)
|
|
: I'm actually trying to follow this criterion, but it's a work in progress. Let me know if any link names can be improved! Link purpose _in context_ always makes sense.
|
|
|
|
SC 3.1.5 Reading Level
|
|
: The required reading ability often exceeds the lower secondary education level, especially on more technical articles.
|
|
|
|
SC 3.1.6 Pronunciation
|
|
: I do not yet provide any pronunciation information.
|
|
|
|
I have only tested WCAG compliance in mainstream browser engines (Blink, Gecko, WebKit).
|
|
|
|
I also go further than WCAG in many aspects:
|
|
|
|
- Rather than follow SC 2.5.5's requirement to achieve a minimum tap target size of 44 by 44 pixels, I follow Google's more strict guidelines. These guidelines mandate that targets are at least 48-by-48 pixels, with no overlap against any other targets in a 56-by-56 pixel range. I try to follow this guideline for any interactive element that isn't a hyperlink surrounded by body text.
|
|
|
|
- I ensure at least one such 56-by-56 px non-interactive region exists on the page, for users with hand tremors or or anyone who wants to tap the screen without clicking something.
|
|
|
|
- With the exception of in-text borders, I only set custom colors in response to the `prefers-color-scheme: dark` media query. These custom colors pass APCA contrast ratios, all being close to the ideal lightness contrast of 90. They are also autism- and overstimulation-friendly colors: yellow links are significantly de-saturated to reduce harshness.
|
|
|
|
- I ensure that the page works on extremely narrow viewports without triggering two-dimensional scaling. It should work at widths well below 200 CSS pixels.
|
|
|
|
### Assessment and evaluation
|
|
|
|
I test each WCAG success criterion myself using the mainstream browser engines (Blink, Gecko, WebKit). I test using multiple screen readers: Orca (primary, with Firefox and Epiphany), NVDA (with Firefox and Chromium), Windows Narrator (with Microsoft Edge), Apple VoiceOver (with desktop and mobile Safari), and Android TalkBack (with Chromium).
|
|
|
|
I also accept user feedback. Users are free to contact me through any means linked on my [About page](../about/).
|
|
|
|
Finally, I supplement manual testing with the following automated tools:
|
|
|
|
- [axe-core](https://github.com/dequelabs/axe-core)
|
|
- [IBM Equal Access Accessibility Checker](https://www.ibm.com/able/toolkit/verify/automated)
|
|
- [AInspector](https://github.com/ainspector/ainspector-for-firefox)
|
|
- [WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool](https://wave.webaim.org/)
|
|
- [ARC Toolkit](https://www.tpgi.com/arc-platform/arc-toolkit/)
|
|
|
|
WAVE reports no errors; AXE is unable to determine certain contrast errors, but it otherwise reports no errors; IBM Equal Access reports no errors but some items that need review.
|
|
|
|
I regularly run axe-core and the IBM Equal Access Accessibility Checker on every page in my sitemap, and receive no errors.
|
|
|
|
Compatibility statement
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
The website is built on well structured, semantic HTML (including [WAI-ARIA](https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/aria/) and [DPUB-ARIA](https://www.w3.org/TR/dpub-aria-1.1/) where appropriate), enhanced with CSS for styling. The website does **not** rely on modern development practices such as CSS Grid, Flexbox, SVG 2, Web fonts, and JavaScript; this should improve support in older browsers such as Internet Explorer 11. No extra plugins or libraries should be required to view the website.
|
|
|
|
This site sticks to Web standards. I regularly run a local build of [the Nu HTML Checker](https://github.com/validator/validator), `xmllint`, and [html proofer](https://github.com/gjtorikian/html-proofer) on every page in my sitemap, and see no errors. I do [filter out false Nu positives](https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one/tree/master/item/linter-configs/vnu_filter.jq) and report them upstream when I can.
|
|
|
|
I also perform cross-browser testing for both HTML and XHTML versions of my pages:
|
|
|
|
- I maintain excellent compatibility with **mainstream engines:** Blink (Chromium and Edge), WebKit (Safari, Epiphany), and Gecko (Firefox). The hidden service also works well with the Tor Browser.
|
|
|
|
- The site works well with **textual browsers.** Lynx and Links2 are first-class citizens for which all features work as intended. [w3m doesn't support soft hyphens](https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=830173), but the site is still otherwise usable in it. I maintain compatibility with these engines by making CSS a strictly-optional progressive enhancement and using semantic markup.
|
|
|
|
- I also regularly test compatibility with **current alternative engines:** the SerenityOS browser, Servo, NetSurf, Dillo, and Goanna (Pale Moon's Gecko fork). I have excellent compatibility with Goanna and Servo. The site is usable in NetSurf, Dillo, and the SerenityOS browser; the always-expanded `<details>` elements might look odd. [The SerenityOS browser doesn't support ECDSA certificates](https://github.com/SerenityOS/serenity/issues/14160), but the Tildeverse mirror works fine. It also has some issues displaying my SVG avatar; it does not attempt to use the PNG fallback.
|
|
|
|
- I occasionally test **abandoned engines,** sometimes with a TLS-terminating proxy if necessary. These engines include Tkhtml, KHTML, Internet Explorer (with and without compatibility mode), Netscape Navigator, and outdated versions of current browsers. The aforementioned issue with `<details>` applies to all of these choices. I use Linux, but testing in browsers like Internet Explorer depends on my access to a Windows machine.
|
|
|
|
Machine-friendliness
|
|
--------------------
|
|
|
|
I think making a site machine-friendly is a great alternative perspective to traditional SEO, the latter of which I think tends to incentivise low-quality content and makes searching difficult.
|
|
|
|
This site is **parser-friendly.** It uses polygot (X)HTML5 markup containing schema.org microdata, microformats2, and legacy microformats. Microformats are useful for IndieWeb compatibility; schema.org microdata is useful for various forms of content-extraction (such as "reading mode" implementations). I've also sprinkled in some Creative Commons vocabulary using RDFa syntax.
|
|
|
|
I make Atom feeds available for articles and notes, and have a combined Atom feed for both. These feeds are enhanced with Ostatus and ActivityStreams XML namespaces.
|
|
|
|
All HTML pages have an XHTML5 counterpart, which is currently the same except for the presence of an XML declaration. To see this counterpart, add "index.xhtml" to the end of a URL or request a page with an `Accept` header containing `application/xhtml+xml` but not `text/html`. All pages parse correctly using all the XHTML browser parsers I could try.
|
|
|
|
### Reading mode compatibility
|
|
|
|
The aforementioned metadata (microdata, microformats) has improved reading-mode compatibility.
|
|
|
|
This site should fully support the Readability algorithm. The Readability algorithm is used by Firefox and Vivaldi. It's the basis of one of multiple distillers used by Brave; Brave typically uses its Readability-based logic on seirdy.one. Readability is the only article distillation algorithm I try to actively support.
|
|
|
|
This site happens to fully support Apple's Reader Mode and Azure Immersive Reader (AIR), the latter of which powers Microsoft Edge's reading mode. Unfortunately, AIR applies a stylesheet atop the extracted article that makes figures difficult to read: it centers text in figures, included pre-formatted blocks. I filed an issue on AIR's feedback forum, but that forum was subsequently deleted.
|
|
|
|
This site works well in the Diffbot article extractor. Diffbot powers a variety of services, including Instapaper.
|
|
|
|
This site does not work well in Chromium's DOM Distiller. DOM Distiller removes all level-2 headings in article bodies. This is likely because they appear alongside section permalinks, which combines poorly with a DOM-Distiller heuristic that strips out sections with a high link-density. DOM Distiller also does not show footnotes, and sometimes cuts off final sections (acknowledgements, conclusions).
|
|
|
|
Privacy
|
|
-------
|
|
|
|
This site is **privacy-respecting.** Its CSP blocks all scripts, third-party content, and other problematic features. I describe how I go out of my way to reduce the information you can transmit on this site in [my privacy policy](../privacy/).
|
|
|