7.2 KiB
| date | title | outputs | description | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-19T04:08:01-04:00 | Classic web badges |
|
My curation of 88x31 badges, representing what I and this site use and stand for. |
My collection of 88x31 badges, representing what I and this site use and stand for. If you have a badge you'd like me to add, just ask; it needs to have a format under 4 kb (preferably under 3 kb) and avoid excessively flashy animations for me to consider it.
My badge
Use this to link to me!
About this site
Read more about the design of this site in my [site design standards page]({{<relref "/meta/site-design.md">}}).
{{}} {{}} {{}} {{}} {{}} {{}} {{}} {{}} {{}} {{}} {{}} {{}}
Notes on "About this site" badges
The W3C Valid HTML5 badge isn't offered by the new Nu HTML Validator, but I use it anyways because my markup is valid. I regularly test all 200-something pages on this site with a local instance of the validator.
Before you email me about how my site has invalid markup and doesn't deserve the "Valid HTML5" badge: The validator also has false positives, which I report upstream (and sometimes fix) and silence in a JQ filter. I use a bleeding-edge version of the Nu HTML Checker and its Jigsaw CSS Validator dependency, as those have the fewest false positives.
Ideological affinity, web-related
{{}} {{}} {{}} {{}} {{}} {{}} {{}} {{}}
Notes on "Ideological affinity, Web-related" badges
I included "Right to repair" in this section because I think that page-alteration (via adblockers, inspect-element, userstyles, etc.) counts as exercising one's right to (software) repair. Free software, accessibility, and Right to Repair are interlinked. I previously microblogged [in defense of content blocking from a right-to-repair perspective]({{<relref "/notes/in-defense-of-content-blocking.md">}}).
Ideological affinity, other
{{}} {{}} {{}} {{}} {{}} {{}} {{}}
Things I use
See [my "uses" page]({{<relref "/about/uses.md">}}) for some more information.
Friendly sites
Other
{{}} {{}}