Use schema.org structured data for corrections

content/notes/politics-and-37signals.md

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Last year, 37signals employees shared the "pyramid of hate" in a work chat in re
 
 However, I don't think this policy is in effect anymore: 37signals leadership is <del cite="https://dragonscave.space/@miki/109411822474469057">using a company blog for</del> [railing against diversity and inclusion](https://world.hey.com/dhh/the-waning-days-of-dei-s-dominance-9a5b656c), and then [doubling down after criticism](https://world.hey.com/dhh/we-must-say-no-to-these-people-e0fb301c). Is the "no politics" rule lifted, is upper management exempt, or does "no politics" only refer to politics that challenges David Heinemeier Hansson to change his behavior? I look forward to hearing a clarification on this rule.
 
-<ins cite="https://dragonscave.space/@miki/109411822474469057">Update <time>2022-11-26</time>: {{<indieweb-person name="Mikołaj Hołysz" itemprop="mentions" url="https://dragonscave.space/@miki">}} tells me that [this isn't a company blog](https://dragonscave.space/@miki/109411822474469057); however, I do think this likely reflects a current or future political stance from 37signals against diversity, equity, and inclusion.</ins>
+<ins itemprop="correction" itemscope="" itemtype="https://schema.org/CorrectionComment" cite="https://dragonscave.space/@miki/109411822474469057">Update <time itemprop="datePublished">2022-11-26</time>: <span itemprop="text">{{<indieweb-person name="Mikołaj Hołysz" itemprop="mentions" url="https://dragonscave.space/@miki">}} tells me that [this isn't a company blog](https://dragonscave.space/@miki/109411822474469057); however, I do think this likely reflects a current or future political stance from 37signals against diversity, equity, and inclusion.</span></ins>
 
 37signals is known for creating Basecamp, Hey.com (an email service with bespoke email filters that are somehow incompatible with IMAP), and for creating Ruby on Rails. It appears to remain a key member of the Rails Foundation. For now.
 

content/posts/experiment-copilot-legality.gmi

@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ I don't think that "going after" a smaller player just to manipulate our legal s
 
 ## Corrections
 
-It's come to my attention that Eloquence may or may not still belong to Nuance. Further research is needed.
+Updated on 2022-07-02: It's come to my attention that Eloquence may or may not still belong to Nuance. Further research is needed.
 Eloquent Technology was acquired by SpeechWorks in 2000.
 
 ## Footnotes

content/posts/experiment-copilot-legality.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 title: "An experiment to test GitHub Copilot's legality"
-date: 2022-07-01T17:30:45-07:00
+date: "2022-07-01T17:30:45-07:00"
 description: "A horrible idea to determine the legality of GitHub Copilot, or of re-creating proprietary speech synthesizers: create legal precedent that doesn't exist yet!"
 outputs:
     - html
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ I don't think that "going after" a smaller player just to manipulate our legal s
 Corrections
 -----------
 
-It's come to my attention that Eloquence may or may not still belong to Nuance. Further research is needed. Eloquent Technology was acquired by SpeechWorks in 2000.
+<span itemprop="correction" itemscope="" itemtype="https://schema.org/CorrectionComment">Updated on <time itemprop="datePublished">2022-07-02</time>: <span itemprop="text">It's has come to my attention that Eloquence may or may not still belong to Nuance. Further research is needed. Eloquent Technology was acquired by SpeechWorks in 2000.</span></span>
 
 </section>