From eb52398dd30fc6a76e90171e912ca2f444c8ea4d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rohan Kumar Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 13:51:16 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Use schema.org structured data for corrections --- content/notes/politics-and-37signals.md | 2 +- content/posts/experiment-copilot-legality.gmi | 2 +- content/posts/experiment-copilot-legality.md | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/content/notes/politics-and-37signals.md b/content/notes/politics-and-37signals.md index 7fd48ad..baac34a 100644 --- a/content/notes/politics-and-37signals.md +++ b/content/notes/politics-and-37signals.md @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Last year, 37signals employees shared the "pyramid of hate" in a work chat in re However, I don't think this policy is in effect anymore: 37signals leadership is using a company blog for [railing against diversity and inclusion](https://world.hey.com/dhh/the-waning-days-of-dei-s-dominance-9a5b656c), and then [doubling down after criticism](https://world.hey.com/dhh/we-must-say-no-to-these-people-e0fb301c). Is the "no politics" rule lifted, is upper management exempt, or does "no politics" only refer to politics that challenges David Heinemeier Hansson to change his behavior? I look forward to hearing a clarification on this rule. -Update : {{}} tells me that [this isn't a company blog](https://dragonscave.space/@miki/109411822474469057); however, I do think this likely reflects a current or future political stance from 37signals against diversity, equity, and inclusion. +Update : {{}} tells me that [this isn't a company blog](https://dragonscave.space/@miki/109411822474469057); however, I do think this likely reflects a current or future political stance from 37signals against diversity, equity, and inclusion. 37signals is known for creating Basecamp, Hey.com (an email service with bespoke email filters that are somehow incompatible with IMAP), and for creating Ruby on Rails. It appears to remain a key member of the Rails Foundation. For now. diff --git a/content/posts/experiment-copilot-legality.gmi b/content/posts/experiment-copilot-legality.gmi index 2f4b109..2b4e91b 100644 --- a/content/posts/experiment-copilot-legality.gmi +++ b/content/posts/experiment-copilot-legality.gmi @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ I don't think that "going after" a smaller player just to manipulate our legal s ## Corrections -It's come to my attention that Eloquence may or may not still belong to Nuance. Further research is needed. +Updated on 2022-07-02: It's come to my attention that Eloquence may or may not still belong to Nuance. Further research is needed. Eloquent Technology was acquired by SpeechWorks in 2000. ## Footnotes diff --git a/content/posts/experiment-copilot-legality.md b/content/posts/experiment-copilot-legality.md index f9ff9c3..2befa51 100644 --- a/content/posts/experiment-copilot-legality.md +++ b/content/posts/experiment-copilot-legality.md @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ --- title: "An experiment to test GitHub Copilot's legality" -date: 2022-07-01T17:30:45-07:00 +date: "2022-07-01T17:30:45-07:00" description: "A horrible idea to determine the legality of GitHub Copilot, or of re-creating proprietary speech synthesizers: create legal precedent that doesn't exist yet!" outputs: - html @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ I don't think that "going after" a smaller player just to manipulate our legal s Corrections ----------- -It's come to my attention that Eloquence may or may not still belong to Nuance. Further research is needed. Eloquent Technology was acquired by SpeechWorks in 2000. +Updated on : It's has come to my attention that Eloquence may or may not still belong to Nuance. Further research is needed. Eloquent Technology was acquired by SpeechWorks in 2000.