content/posts/fediverse-blocklists.gmi

@@ -78,9 +78,7 @@ Before you decide to trust one of my lists, please read the "Mistakes made" sect
 
 ## Mistakes made
 
-Here, I publicly document all significant mistakes I've made in the process. I sort entries in descending order by date addressed.
+Here, I'll publicly document I document all significant mistakes I've made in the process. I sort entries in descending order by date addressed.
-
-One mistake hasn't yet been listed; I'll wait for approval from one of the people impacted.
 
 ### Early April 2023: Oliphant's max list containing bad entries
 
@@ -91,7 +89,7 @@ I work with Oliphant when generating lists; we share ideas regularly.
 => https://oliphant.social/@Oliphant Oliphant's Fediverse profile
 => https://codeberg.org/oliphant/blocklists Oliphant's blocklist repository
 
-Using an approach inspired by my tier0.csv generation process, he makes lists generated from consensus across other lists. Unlike tier0.csv, the generated lists don't have significant manual curation. Oliphant's tier-1, tier-2, and tier-3 blocklists require decreasing levels of consensus. Until recently, he also offered a "unified max" blocklist containing every entry on any trusted source.
+Using an approach inspired by my tier0.csv generation process, he makes lists generated from consensus across other lists. Unlike tier0.csv, the generated lists don't have significant manual curation. Oliphant's tier-1, tier-2, and tier-3 blocklists require decreasing levels of consensus. Until recently, he also offered a "unified max" blocklist containing any entry common across at least two other blocklists.
 
 One of Oliphant's sources was a single-user instance with many blocks made for personal reasons: the admin was uncomfortable with topics related to sex and romance. Blocking for personal reasons on a personal instance is totally fine, but those blocks shouldn't make their way onto a list intended for others to use. The admin of this instance gave permission to use this blocklist. However, they did warn us of this fact. With my own encouragement, we decided to use their list anyway.
 

content/posts/fediverse-blocklists.md

@@ -86,15 +86,13 @@ Before you decide to trust one of my lists, please read the "Mistakes made" sect
 Mistakes made
 -------------
 
-Here, I publicly document all significant mistakes I've made in the process. I sort entries in descending order by date addressed.
+Here, I'll publicly document I document all significant mistakes I've made in the process. I sort entries in descending order by date addressed.
-
-One mistake hasn't yet been listed; I'll wait for approval from one of the people impacted.
 
 ### Early April 2023: Oliphant's max list containing bad entries
 
 I made a mistake that didn't have a negative impact on my lists, but did impact someone else's. Even if my own lists came out okay, the fact that I allowed this to happen should be enough reason for you to seriously question my judgement.
 
-I work with {{<indieweb-person name="Oliphant" url="https://oliphant.social/@Oliphant" itemprop="mentions">}} when generating lists; we share ideas regularly. Oliphant offers [his own respository of blocklists](https://codeberg.org/oliphant/blocklists) ([GitHub mirror](https://github.com/sgrigson/oliphant)). Using an approach inspired by my `tier0.csv` generation process, he makes lists generated from consensus across other lists. Unlike `tier0.csv`, the generated lists don't have significant manual curation. Oliphant's tier-1, tier-2, and tier-3 blocklists require decreasing levels of consensus. Until recently, he also offered a "unified max" blocklist containing ~~any entry common across at least two other blocklists~~ <ins datetime="2023-05-02T08:38:00-07:00">every entry from any trusted source</ins>.
+I work with {{<indieweb-person name="Oliphant" url="https://oliphant.social/@Oliphant" itemprop="mentions">}} when generating lists; we share ideas regularly. Oliphant offers [his own respository of blocklists](https://codeberg.org/oliphant/blocklists) ([GitHub mirror](https://github.com/sgrigson/oliphant)). Using an approach inspired by my `tier0.csv` generation process, he makes lists generated from consensus across other lists. Unlike `tier0.csv`, the generated lists don't have significant manual curation. Oliphant's tier-1, tier-2, and tier-3 blocklists require decreasing levels of consensus. Until recently, he also offered a "unified max" blocklist containing any entry common across at least two other blocklists.
 
 One of Oliphant's sources was a single-user instance with many blocks made for personal reasons: the admin was uncomfortable with topics related to sex and romance. Blocking for personal reasons on a personal instance is totally fine, but those blocks shouldn't make their way onto a list intended for others to use. The admin of this instance gave permission to use this blocklist. However, **they did warn us of this fact.** With my own encouragement, **we decided to use their list anyway.**