1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one synced 2025-02-25 15:50:05 +00:00

Compare commits

...

2 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Rohan Kumar
296ef06020
syndicate 2023-02-15 09:36:28 -08:00
Rohan Kumar
a3dd303b48
New note: Yuescript first impressions 2023-02-15 09:35:15 -08:00

View file

@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
---
title: "Yuescript first impressions"
date: 2023-02-15T09:35:15-08:00
syndicatedCopies:
- title: 'The Fediverse'
url: 'https://pleroma.envs.net/notice/ASi7iC9E0WfUIObg5A'
---
I just discovered [Yuescript](https://yuescript.org/doc/), which is like MoonScript with more features. I have mixed feelings.
I like features like pipelines (much cleaner than repeated assignment or nested parentheses in function calls) and compile-time macros. The sugar for multiple and destructuring assignment is handy.
I find the additional operators unnecessary, and not worth their cognitive overhead. The `?` operator was already used as sugar for a parameter-free function call. The `[]` operator could easily have been a function in a library instead.
One of the trade-offs for this much syntactic sugar is some syntactic ambiguity. An opinionated formatter could resolve some of this.