1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one synced 2024-11-10 00:12:09 +00:00

Compare commits

...

2 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Rohan Kumar
59e660586e
Syndicate 2023-11-21 23:22:58 -08:00
Rohan Kumar
8e7865d106
Syndicate 2023-11-21 22:30:47 -08:00

View file

@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
---
title: "More native than a Web app"
date: 2023-11-21T22:30:17-08:00
syndicatedCopies:
- title: 'The Fediverse'
url: 'https://pleroma.envs.net/notice/Ac3YFDiQUINNybAA4W'
- title: 'jstpst'
url: 'https://www.jstpst.net/f/just_post/9096/more-native-than-a-web-app'
- title: 'IndieNews'
url: 'https://news.indieweb.org/en'
---
Whenever I discover a new GUI toolkit, my first question is always "is it more native than the Web?" For reference, here are some ways Web apps have better system integration than Flutter:
- System fonts, font hinting settings, and font fallback settings.
- System text navigation shortcuts.
- System scrollbar visibility, thickness, and click settings/behavior.
- System highlight menus and controls (on touchscreens).
- System display scaling settings.
- System reduced-motion settings (An API is documented, but I have never used a Flutter app that actually disables animations. I may be wrong).
- System reduced-transparency settings.
- System forced-colors mode (Windows High Contrast Mode).
- System color palettes (some browsers support setting default colors without necessarily forcing the palette).
- System media controls (play/pause/skip, current track, e.g. using MPRIS on freedesktop platforms).
It's an easier question to answer than my second question: "What <abbr title="Web Content Accessibility Guidelines">WCAG</abbr> conformance level can I hope for?