assets/css/main.css

@@ -108,11 +108,6 @@ html {
 		padding: 0 .5em;
 	}
 
-	/* Align titular h1 with top nav and body text. */
-	main > h1 {
-		padding-left: .25em
-	}
-
 	/* Archive pages can get long. Allow them to get long without slowing
 	 * down the browser by using content-visibility. */
 	li article {

content/notes/re-gh-copilot-takes.md

@@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
----
-title: "Re: GH Copilot takes"
-date: 2022-07-20T08:55:38-07:00
-replyURI: "https://mastodon.social/@humanetech/108677838939825183"
-replyTitle: "Fully IANAL philosophical showerthoughts"
-replyType: "SocialMediaPosting"
-replyAuthor: "Humane Tech Now"
-replyAuthorURI: "https://mastodon.social/@humanetech"
----
-> They are like workers that are hired.
-
-Laws around "works for hire" come with their own copyright baggage that assumes workers are actual people; for instance, these laws include mechanisms by which workers can claim copyright themselves.
-
-I'm not opposed to the general principle of training a model on copyrighted works potentially being fair use; however, the generated works would need to be sufficiently novel or seemingly "creative" by human standards for it to work. Otherwise, you're in "derived work" territory. This, I think, is a major difference between the likes of DALL-E and Midjourney, and the likes of Copilot.
-
-I personally found all the discourse way too hilarious, and wrote a satirical article on it only to get clobbered by Poe's Law: <cite><a href="{{<relref "/posts/experiment-copilot-legality">}}">An experiment to test GitHub Copilot's legality</a></cite>.
-