Fix: titular h1 alignment

assets/css/main.css

@@ -108,6 +108,11 @@ html {
 		padding: 0 .5em;
 	}
 
+	/* Align titular h1 with top nav and body text. */
+	main > h1 {
+		padding-left: .25em
+	}
+
 	/* Archive pages can get long. Allow them to get long without slowing
 	 * down the browser by using content-visibility. */
 	li article {

content/notes/re-gh-copilot-takes.md

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+---
+title: "Re: GH Copilot takes"
+date: 2022-07-20T08:55:38-07:00
+replyURI: "https://mastodon.social/@humanetech/108677838939825183"
+replyTitle: "Fully IANAL philosophical showerthoughts"
+replyType: "SocialMediaPosting"
+replyAuthor: "Humane Tech Now"
+replyAuthorURI: "https://mastodon.social/@humanetech"
+---
+> They are like workers that are hired.
+
+Laws around "works for hire" come with their own copyright baggage that assumes workers are actual people; for instance, these laws include mechanisms by which workers can claim copyright themselves.
+
+I'm not opposed to the general principle of training a model on copyrighted works potentially being fair use; however, the generated works would need to be sufficiently novel or seemingly "creative" by human standards for it to work. Otherwise, you're in "derived work" territory. This, I think, is a major difference between the likes of DALL-E and Midjourney, and the likes of Copilot.
+
+I personally found all the discourse way too hilarious, and wrote a satirical article on it only to get clobbered by Poe's Law: <cite><a href="{{<relref "/posts/experiment-copilot-legality">}}">An experiment to test GitHub Copilot's legality</a></cite>.
+