mirror of
https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one
synced 2024-11-24 05:02:10 +00:00
Compare commits
2 commits
42722afe60
...
2c133b1870
Author | SHA1 | Date | |
---|---|---|---|
|
2c133b1870 | ||
|
586d201749 |
3 changed files with 15 additions and 0 deletions
10
content/notes/alternative-textual-browsers.md
Normal file
10
content/notes/alternative-textual-browsers.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
title: "Alternative textual browsers"
|
||||||
|
date: 2022-08-06T19:00:03-07:00
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
I've used [many textual browsers]({{<relref "/meta/site-design.md#compatibility-statement">}}), but I'm interested in more hardened options. Browsers parse untrusted content from the Internet but no textual browsers employ sandboxing, continuous fuzzing, or other security measures. Check CVEs for Lynx or w3m and you'll see what I mean.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I'm also looking at alternatives to [my w3m-sandbox script](https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/bwrap-scripts/tree/trunk/item/w3m-sandbox) to show HTML emails. Pandoc with `commonmark-raw_html` output is an option; Haskell seems like a better choice than un-fuzzed C for this. I'd like a more battle-hardened library for networking, like libcurl (used in Edbrowse).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I considered [Offpunk](https://notabug.org/ploum/offpunk), which uses Readability to extract articles. I'd rather pipe [rdrview](https://github.com/eafer/rdrview) output to w3m-sandbox. rdrview does some sandboxing, and sanitizes input to a subset of HTML.
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -154,4 +154,7 @@ If you wish to write anonymously, I recommend the following:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
5. If, after doing the prior steps, your anonymous work still has a reading level too similar to your non-anonymous writing: reduce the reading level by choosing simpler words.
|
5. If, after doing the prior steps, your anonymous work still has a reading level too similar to your non-anonymous writing: reduce the reading level by choosing simpler words.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
More information about stylometric fingerprinting resistance is on the Hitchiker's Guide to Online Anonymity:
|
||||||
|
=> https://anonymousplanet-ng.org/guide.html#appendix-a4-counteracting-forensic-linguistics HGOA Appendix A4: counteracting forensic linguistics
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Stay safe, everyone.
|
Stay safe, everyone.
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -174,6 +174,8 @@ If you wish to write anonymously, I recommend the following:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
5. If, after doing the prior steps, your anonymous work still has a reading level too similar to your non-anonymous writing: reduce the reading level by choosing simpler words.
|
5. If, after doing the prior steps, your anonymous work still has a reading level too similar to your non-anonymous writing: reduce the reading level by choosing simpler words.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
More information on stylometric fingerprinting resistance is on {{<mention-work itemtype="TechArticle" itemprop="citation">}}{{<cited-work name="The Hitchiker's Guide to Online Anonymity" extraName="headline" url="https://anonymousplanet-ng.org/guide.html#appendix-a4-counteracting-forensic-linguistics">}}{{</mention-work>}}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Stay safe, everyone.
|
Stay safe, everyone.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
</section>
|
</section>
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue