fmaury/seirdy.one
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one synced 2024-11-23 21:02:09 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Compare commits

base: fmaury:187d82975aabf212772a99fed430e573605e1048
Branches Tags
fmaury:master
fmaury:draft-searchengines
...
compare: fmaury:eb690f5e09a23b94d5f7a2d8f28e563b3faffdd3
Branches Tags
fmaury:master
fmaury:draft-searchengines

2 commits
187d82975a ... eb690f5e09

Author SHA1 Message Date
Rohan Kumar
eb690f5e09
Typo, mention one mistake not listed. 2023-05-02 10:54:28 -07:00
Rohan Kumar
f56399df2b
Correction about unified-max blocklist 2023-05-02 08:39:50 -07:00
2 changed files with 8 additions and 4 deletions
Show stats Expand all files Collapse all files

6
content/posts/fediverse-blocklists.gmi
View file

@ -78,7 +78,9 @@ Before you decide to trust one of my lists, please read the "Mistakes made" sect
## Mistakes made
Here, I'll publicly document I document all significant mistakes I've made in the process. I sort entries in descending order by date addressed.
Here, I publicly document all significant mistakes I've made in the process. I sort entries in descending order by date addressed.
One mistake hasn't yet been listed; I'll wait for approval from one of the people impacted.
### Early April 2023: Oliphant's max list containing bad entries
@ -89,7 +91,7 @@ I work with Oliphant when generating lists; we share ideas regularly.
=> https://oliphant.social/@Oliphant Oliphant's Fediverse profile
=> https://codeberg.org/oliphant/blocklists Oliphant's blocklist repository
Using an approach inspired by my tier0.csv generation process, he makes lists generated from consensus across other lists. Unlike tier0.csv, the generated lists don't have significant manual curation. Oliphant's tier-1, tier-2, and tier-3 blocklists require decreasing levels of consensus. Until recently, he also offered a "unified max" blocklist containing any entry common across at least two other blocklists.
Using an approach inspired by my tier0.csv generation process, he makes lists generated from consensus across other lists. Unlike tier0.csv, the generated lists don't have significant manual curation. Oliphant's tier-1, tier-2, and tier-3 blocklists require decreasing levels of consensus. Until recently, he also offered a "unified max" blocklist containing every entry on any trusted source.
One of Oliphant's sources was a single-user instance with many blocks made for personal reasons: the admin was uncomfortable with topics related to sex and romance. Blocking for personal reasons on a personal instance is totally fine, but those blocks shouldn't make their way onto a list intended for others to use. The admin of this instance gave permission to use this blocklist. However, they did warn us of this fact. With my own encouragement, we decided to use their list anyway.

6
content/posts/fediverse-blocklists.md
View file

@ -86,13 +86,15 @@ Before you decide to trust one of my lists, please read the "Mistakes made" sect
Mistakes made
-------------
Here, I'll publicly document I document all significant mistakes I've made in the process. I sort entries in descending order by date addressed.
Here, I publicly document all significant mistakes I've made in the process. I sort entries in descending order by date addressed.
One mistake hasn't yet been listed; I'll wait for approval from one of the people impacted.
### Early April 2023: Oliphant's max list containing bad entries
I made a mistake that didn't have a negative impact on my lists, but did impact someone else's. Even if my own lists came out okay, the fact that I allowed this to happen should be enough reason for you to seriously question my judgement.
I work with {{<indieweb-person name="Oliphant" url="https://oliphant.social/@Oliphant" itemprop="mentions">}} when generating lists; we share ideas regularly. Oliphant offers [his own respository of blocklists](https://codeberg.org/oliphant/blocklists) ([GitHub mirror](https://github.com/sgrigson/oliphant)). Using an approach inspired by my `tier0.csv` generation process, he makes lists generated from consensus across other lists. Unlike `tier0.csv`, the generated lists don't have significant manual curation. Oliphant's tier-1, tier-2, and tier-3 blocklists require decreasing levels of consensus. Until recently, he also offered a "unified max" blocklist containing any entry common across at least two other blocklists.
I work with {{<indieweb-person name="Oliphant" url="https://oliphant.social/@Oliphant" itemprop="mentions">}} when generating lists; we share ideas regularly. Oliphant offers [his own respository of blocklists](https://codeberg.org/oliphant/blocklists) ([GitHub mirror](https://github.com/sgrigson/oliphant)). Using an approach inspired by my `tier0.csv` generation process, he makes lists generated from consensus across other lists. Unlike `tier0.csv`, the generated lists don't have significant manual curation. Oliphant's tier-1, tier-2, and tier-3 blocklists require decreasing levels of consensus. Until recently, he also offered a "unified max" blocklist containing ~~any entry common across at least two other blocklists~~ <ins datetime="2023-05-02T08:38:00-07:00">every entry from any trusted source</ins>.
One of Oliphant's sources was a single-user instance with many blocks made for personal reasons: the admin was uncomfortable with topics related to sex and romance. Blocking for personal reasons on a personal instance is totally fine, but those blocks shouldn't make their way onto a list intended for others to use. The admin of this instance gave permission to use this blocklist. However, **they did warn us of this fact.** With my own encouragement, **we decided to use their list anyway.**