fmaury/seirdy.one
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one synced 2024-09-20 04:12:09 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Add two search engines, minor fixes

Browse source 
- Two new engines: search.tl and Anoox
- Replace some HTTP with HTTPS
- Add an <abbr> tag
- Spelling/capitalization
This commit is contained in:
Rohan Kumar 2021-03-17 13:38:00 -07:00
parent 2818993f3b
commit f40862bc89
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 1E892DB2A5F84479
2 changed files with 18 additions and 12 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

14
content/posts/search-engines-with-own-indexes.gmi
View file

@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ These engines pass most of the tests listed in the “methodology” section.
* Gowiki : Very young, small index, but shows promise. I discovered this in the seirdy.one access logs. Currently only available in the US. * Gowiki : Very young, small index, but shows promise. I discovered this in the seirdy.one access logs. Currently only available in the US.
=> https://rightdao.com Right Dao => https://rightdao.com Right Dao
=> http://gigablast.com/ Gigablast => https://gigablast.com/ Gigablast
=> https://private.sh Private.sh => https://private.sh Private.sh
=> https://gowiki.com Gowiki => https://gowiki.com Gowiki
@ -93,13 +93,15 @@ These engines fail badly at a few important tests.
* wbsrch : In addition to its generalist search, it also has many other utilities related to domain name statistics. Failed multiple tests. Its index is a bit dated; it has an old backlog of sites it hasn’t finished indexing. It also has several dedicated per-language indexes. * wbsrch : In addition to its generalist search, it also has many other utilities related to domain name statistics. Failed multiple tests. Its index is a bit dated; it has an old backlog of sites it hasn’t finished indexing. It also has several dedicated per-language indexes.
* ExactSeek : small index, disproportionately dominated by big sites. Failed multiple tests. Allows submitting individual URLs for crawling, but requires entering an email address and receiving a newsletter. Webmaster tools seem to heavily push for paid SEO options. * ExactSeek : small index, disproportionately dominated by big sites. Failed multiple tests. Allows submitting individual URLs for crawling, but requires entering an email address and receiving a newsletter. Webmaster tools seem to heavily push for paid SEO options.
* Meorca: A UK-based search engine that claims not to "index pornography or illegal content websites". It also features a public blog with a marketplace and free games. Allows submitting URLs, but requires a full name, email, phone number, and "business name" to do so. Discovered in the seirdy.one access logs. * Meorca: A UK-based search engine that claims not to "index pornography or illegal content websites". It also features a public blog with a marketplace and free games. Allows submitting URLs, but requires a full name, email, phone number, and "business name" to do so. Discovered in the seirdy.one access logs.
* search.tl: Generalist search for one TLD at a time (defaults to .com). I'm not sure why you'd want to do this, but it exists. There isn't any visible UI for changing the TLD for available results; you need to add/change the "tld" URL paramater. For example, to search .org sites, append "&tld=org" to the URL. It seems to be connected to Amidalla.de, but Amidalla doesn't seem to currently be operational. Amidalla allows users to manually add URLs to its index and directory; I have yet to see if doing so impacts search.tl results.
=> http://www.seekport.com/ seekport => http://www.seekport.com/ seekport
=> http://www.exalead.com/search/ Exalead => https://www.exalead.com/search/ Exalead
=> https://curlie.org Curlie => https://curlie.org Curlie
=> https://wbsrch.com/ wbsrch => https://wbsrch.com/ wbsrch
=> https://www.exactseek.com/ ExactSeek => https://www.exactseek.com/ ExactSeek
=> https://meorca.com/ Meorca Search Engine => https://meorca.com/ Meorca Search Engine
=> http://www.search.tl search.tl
### Unusable engines, irrelevant results ### Unusable engines, irrelevant results
@ -108,14 +110,16 @@ Results from these search engines don’t seem at all useful.
* YaCy: community-made index; slow. Results are awful/irrelevant, but can be useful for intranet or custom search. * YaCy: community-made index; slow. Results are awful/irrelevant, but can be useful for intranet or custom search.
* Scopia: only seems to be available via the MetaGer metasearch engine after turning off Bing and news results. Tiny index, very low-quality. * Scopia: only seems to be available via the MetaGer metasearch engine after turning off Bing and news results. Tiny index, very low-quality.
* Active Search Results : very poor quality * Active Search Results : very poor quality
* Crawlson: young, slow. In this category because its index has a cap of 10 urls per domain. I initially discovered Crawlson in the seirdy.one access logs. The site seems to be down right now, so I didn’t link it. * Crawlson: young, slow. In this category because its index has a cap of 10 URLs per domain. I initially discovered Crawlson in the seirdy.one access logs. The site seems to be down right now, so I didn’t link it.
* Anoox: Results are few and irrelevant; fails to find any results for basic terms. Allows site submission. It's also a lightweight social network and claims to be powered by its users, letting members vote on listings to alter rankings.
=> https://metager.org MetaGer => https://metager.org MetaGer
=> https://www.activesearchresults.com Active Search Results => https://www.activesearchresults.com Active Search Results
=> https://www.anoox.com/ Anoox
## Non-generalist search ## Non-generalist search
These indexing search engines don’t have a Google-like “ask me anything” endgame; they’re trying to do something different. These indexing search engines don’t have a Google-like “ask me anything” endgame; they’re trying to do something different. You aren't supposed to use these engines the same way you use GBY.
* Wiby: I love this one. It focuses on smaller independent sites that capture the spirit of the “early” web. It’s more focused on “discovering” new interesting pages that match a set of keywords than finding a specific resources. I like to think of Wiby as an engine for surfing, not searching. Runnaroo occasionally features a hit from Wiby. If you have a small site or blog that isn’t very “commercial”, consider submitting it to the index. * Wiby: I love this one. It focuses on smaller independent sites that capture the spirit of the “early” web. It’s more focused on “discovering” new interesting pages that match a set of keywords than finding a specific resources. I like to think of Wiby as an engine for surfing, not searching. Runnaroo occasionally features a hit from Wiby. If you have a small site or blog that isn’t very “commercial”, consider submitting it to the index.
* Search My Site: Similar to Wiby, but only indexes user-submitted personal and independent sites. It optionally supports IndieAuth. * Search My Site: Similar to Wiby, but only indexes user-submitted personal and independent sites. It optionally supports IndieAuth.
@ -151,7 +155,7 @@ I’m unable to evaluate these engines properly since I don’t speak the necess
* fastbot: German * fastbot: German
* Moose.at: German (Austria-based) * Moose.at: German (Austria-based)
=> http://www.parsijoo.ir/ Parsijoo => https://www.parsijoo.ir/ Parsijoo
=> https://search.ch search.ch => https://search.ch search.ch
=> https://www.fastbot.de/ fastbot => https://www.fastbot.de/ fastbot
=> https://www.moose.at Moose.at => https://www.moose.at Moose.at

12
content/posts/search-engines-with-own-indexes.md
View file

@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ These are large engines that pass all the above tests and more.
These engines pass most of the tests listed in the "methodology" section. These engines pass most of the tests listed in the "methodology" section.
- [Right Dao](https://rightdao.com): very fast, good results. Passes the tests fairly well. - [Right Dao](https://rightdao.com): very fast, good results. Passes the tests fairly well.
- [Gigablast](http://gigablast.com/): It's been around for a while and also sports a classic web directory. Searches are a bit slow, and it charges to submit sites for crawling. It powers [Private.sh](https://private.sh). Gigablast is tied with Right Dao for quality. - [Gigablast](https://gigablast.com/): It's been around for a while and also sports a classic web directory. Searches are a bit slow, and it charges to submit sites for crawling. It powers [Private.sh](https://private.sh). Gigablast is tied with Right Dao for quality.
- [Gowiki](https://gowiki.com): Very young, small index, but shows promise. I discovered this in the seirdy.one access logs. Currently only available in the US. - [Gowiki](https://gowiki.com): Very young, small index, but shows promise. I discovered this in the seirdy.one access logs. Currently only available in the US.
### Smaller indexes, hit-and-miss ### Smaller indexes, hit-and-miss
@ -88,10 +88,11 @@ These engines pass most of the tests listed in the "methodology" section.
These engines fail badly at a few important tests. These engines fail badly at a few important tests.
- [seekport](http://www.seekport.com/): The interface is in German but it supports searching in English just fine. The default language is selected by your locale. It's really good considering its small index; it hasn't heard of less common terms (e.g. "Seirdy"), but it's able to find relevant results in other tests. - [seekport](http://www.seekport.com/): The interface is in German but it supports searching in English just fine. The default language is selected by your locale. It's really good considering its small index; it hasn't heard of less common terms (e.g. "Seirdy"), but it's able to find relevant results in other tests.
- [Exalead](http://www.exalead.com/search/): slow, quality is hit-and-miss. Its indexer claims to crawl the DMOZ directory, which has since shut down and been replaced by the [Curlie](https://curlie.org) directory. No relevant results for "Oppenheimer" and some other history-related queries. Allows submitting individual URLs for indexing, but requires solving a Google reCAPTCHA and entering an email address. - [Exalead](https://www.exalead.com/search/): slow, quality is hit-and-miss. Its indexer claims to crawl the DMOZ directory, which has since shut down and been replaced by the [Curlie](https://curlie.org) directory. No relevant results for "Oppenheimer" and some other history-related queries. Allows submitting individual URLs for indexing, but requires solving a Google reCAPTCHA and entering an email address.
- [wbsrch](https://wbsrch.com/): In addition to its generalist search, it also has many other utilities related to domain name statistics. Failed multiple tests. Its index is a bit dated; it has an old backlog of sites it hasn't finished indexing. It also has several per-language indexes. - [wbsrch](https://wbsrch.com/): In addition to its generalist search, it also has many other utilities related to domain name statistics. Failed multiple tests. Its index is a bit dated; it has an old backlog of sites it hasn't finished indexing. It also has several per-language indexes.
- [ExactSeek](https://www.exactseek.com/): small index, disproportionately dominated by big sites. Failed multiple tests. Allows submitting individual URLs for crawling, but requires entering an email address and receiving a newsletter. Webmaster tools seem to heavily push for paid SEO options. - [ExactSeek](https://www.exactseek.com/): small index, disproportionately dominated by big sites. Failed multiple tests. Allows submitting individual URLs for crawling, but requires entering an email address and receiving a newsletter. Webmaster tools seem to heavily push for paid <abbr title="search-engine optimization">SEO</abbr> options.
- [Meorca](https://meorca.com/): a search engine that claims not to "index pornography or illegal content websites". It also features a public blog with a marketplace and free games. Allows submitting URLs, but requires a full name, email, phone number, and "business name" to do so. Discovered in the seirdy.one access logs. - [Meorca](https://meorca.com/): a search engine that claims not to "index pornography or illegal content websites". It also features a public blog with a marketplace and free games. Allows submitting URLs, but requires a full name, email, phone number, and "business name" to do so. Discovered in the seirdy.one access logs.
* [search.tl](http://www.search.tl/): Generalist search for one <abbr title="top-level domain">TLD</abbr> at a time (defaults to .com). I'm not sure why you'd want to do this, but it exists. There isn't any visible UI for changing the TLD for available results; you need to add/change the `tld` URL parameter. For example, to search .org sites, append `&tld=org` to the URL. It seems to be connected to [Amidalla](http://www.amidalla.de/), but Amidalla doesn't seem to currently be operational. Amidalla allows users to manually add URLs to its index and directory; I have yet to see if doing so impacts search.tl results.
### Unusable engines, irrelevant results ### Unusable engines, irrelevant results
@ -100,7 +101,8 @@ Results from these search engines don't seem at all useful.
- YaCy: community-made index; slow. Results are awful/irrelevant, but can be useful for intranet or custom search. - YaCy: community-made index; slow. Results are awful/irrelevant, but can be useful for intranet or custom search.
- Scopia: only seems to be available via the [MetaGer](https://metager.org) metasearch engine after turning off Bing and news results. Tiny index, very low-quality. - Scopia: only seems to be available via the [MetaGer](https://metager.org) metasearch engine after turning off Bing and news results. Tiny index, very low-quality.
- [Active Search Results](https://www.activesearchresults.com): very poor quality - [Active Search Results](https://www.activesearchresults.com): very poor quality
- Crawlson: young, slow. In this category because its index has a cap of 10 urls per domain. I initially discovered Crawlson in the seirdy.one access logs. The site seems to be down right now, so I didn't link it. - Crawlson: young, slow. In this category because its index has a cap of 10 URLs per domain. I initially discovered Crawlson in the seirdy.one access logs. The site seems to be down right now, so I didn't link it.
- [Anoox](https://www.anoox.com/): Results are few and irrelevant; fails to find any results for basic terms. Allows site submission. It's also a lightweight social network and claims to be powered by its users, letting members vote on listings to alter rankings.
Non-generalist search Non-generalist search
--------------------- ---------------------
@ -128,7 +130,7 @@ I'm unable to evaluate these engines properly since I don't speak the necessary
### Smaller indexes ### Smaller indexes
- [Parsijoo](http://www.parsijoo.ir/): Persian - [Parsijoo](https://www.parsijoo.ir/): Persian
- [search.ch](https://search.ch): Regional search engine for Switzerland; users can restrict searches to their local regions. - [search.ch](https://search.ch): Regional search engine for Switzerland; users can restrict searches to their local regions.
- [fastbot](https://www.fastbot.de/): German - [fastbot](https://www.fastbot.de/): German
- [Moose.at](https://www.moose.at): German (Austria-based) - [Moose.at](https://www.moose.at): German (Austria-based)