fmaury/seirdy.one
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one synced 2024-11-23 12:52:10 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Meta:: describe 0-RTT adoption

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Rohan Kumar 2023-12-08 16:09:12 -08:00
parent a870c2556a
commit f060fcf13d
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 1E892DB2A5F84479
1 changed files with 3 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
content/meta/_index.md
View file

@ -82,7 +82,9 @@ Awards and badges
<figcaption itemprop="caption"> <figcaption itemprop="caption">
[Internet.nl](https://internet.nl/) offers an automated website security check. Relevant buzzwords include IPv6, DNSSEC, TLS, HTTP security headers, and RPKI. [See a report for seirdy.one](https://internet.nl/site/seirdy.one/1745918/). [Internet.nl](https://internet.nl/) offers an automated website security check. Relevant buzzwords include IPv6, DNSSEC, TLS, HTTP security headers, and RPKI. [See a report for seirdy.one](https://internet.nl/site/seirdy.one/2510940/).
Internet.nl penalizes the use of [0-RTT](https://blog.cloudflare.com/introducing-0-rtt/) because it opens sites up to replay attacks. Since passing the test, I moved all non-idempotent content to other subdomains. Save for some fancy Nginx redirects, everything on the `seirdy.one` domain is static public content. This property made it safe to enable 0-RTT without being at risk of replay attacks. As of right now, I don't pass the test, but I consider the 0-RTT failure to be a false positive.
</figcaption> </figcaption>