fmaury/seirdy.one
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one synced 2024-12-24 01:42:10 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Link to primary instead of secondary source

Browse source 
Thanks shivaram for the feedback
This commit is contained in:
Rohan Kumar 2021-02-23 22:07:48 -08:00
parent a189305ee4
commit e97107e852
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 1E892DB2A5F84479
2 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
content/posts/keeping-platforms-open.gmi
View file

@ -115,9 +115,9 @@ For example, Element and the Matrix.org Foundation would alleviate most of my co
## Drawbacks
The biggest drawback to the advice I've presented is development speed. Keeping compatibility and spec compliance slows down the rate at which new features can be added. As one Hacker News reader pointed out, Signal might not have been able to implement as many features if it was an open platform:
The biggest drawback to the advice I've presented is development speed. Keeping compatibility and spec compliance slows down the rate at which new features can be added. As Moxie argues, Signal might not have been able to implement as many features if it was an open platform:
=> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25986551 Hacker News comment by tao_oat
=> https://signal.org/blog/the-ecosystem-is-moving/ The ecosystem is moving (Signal blog)
Open platforms with multiple providers and implementations often suffer from poorer usability, especially with regards to onboarding. Instead of just opening the official app/website, users need to choose from multiple clients and providers. This can be a turn-off for casual users just wanting to try something out. One of the best ways to improve the onboarding experience is to offer recommendations to your non-technical friends; you know them well and can probably help them make an informed decision.

2
content/posts/keeping-platforms-open.md
View file

@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ For example, Element and the Matrix.org Foundation would alleviate most of my co
Drawbacks
---------
The biggest drawback to the advice I've presented is development speed. Keeping compatibility and spec compliance slows down the rate at which new features can be added. As one Hacker News reader [pointed out](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25986551), Signal might not have been able to implement as many features if it was an open platform.
The biggest drawback to the advice I've presented is development speed. Keeping compatibility and spec compliance slows down the rate at which new features can be added. As Moxie [argues](https://signal.org/blog/the-ecosystem-is-moving/), Signal might not have been able to implement as many features if it was an open platform.
Open platforms with multiple providers and implementations often suffer from poorer usability, especially with regards to onboarding. Instead of just opening the official app/website, users need to choose from multiple clients and providers. This can be a turn-off for casual users just wanting to try something out. One of the best ways to improve the onboarding experience is to offer recommendations to your non-technical friends; you know them well and can probably help them make an informed decision.