mirror of
https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one
synced 2024-11-23 21:02:09 +00:00
Typo, mention problematic Immersive Reader css
This commit is contained in:
parent
dc8a635cf9
commit
e63e856c9a
2 changed files with 5 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ Using containment for content at the end of the page is relatively safe. Using i
|
|||
|
||||
## In-page search
|
||||
|
||||
In-page search (e.g., using "Ctrl + s") has been a basic feature in document readers well before browsers, and continues to be an essential feature today.
|
||||
In-page search (e.g., using "Ctrl + f") has been a basic feature in document readers well before browsers, and continues to be an essential feature today.
|
||||
|
||||
Web pages that hide content behind "show content" widgets are difficult to search through: users need to toggle "show content" for each item they wish to search. Often, in-page search highlights are hidden; Reddit's atrocious redesign is a serious offender.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -978,9 +978,10 @@ Reading modes leverage article extractors such as Readability.js (integrated int
|
|||
=> https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/dom-distiller/ DOM Distiller
|
||||
=> https://trafilatura.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ Trafilatura
|
||||
|
||||
Safari's proprietary fork of Readability has grown quite complex compared to upstream; Edge's Immersive Reader is a mystery to me:
|
||||
Safari's proprietary fork of Readability has grown quite complex compared to upstream; Edge's Immersive Reader is a mystery to me, with a problematic stylesheet:
|
||||
|
||||
=> https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/discussions/documentation-on-huerestics-used-during-article-distillation-in/m-p/3266436 Forum post: Documentation on huerestics used during article distillation in Immersive Reader
|
||||
=> https://feedbackportal.microsoft.com/feedback/idea/e0d9b299-e3b6-ec11-a81c-000d3a7ce453 Text in figures should not be centered: Immersive Reader feedback portal
|
||||
|
||||
I don't recommend catering to each tool's non-standard quirks. Studying their design reveals that they observe open standards, to varying degrees. Readability, DOM Distiller, and Trafilatura understand plain-old, semantic HTML (POSH).
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ Using containment for content at the end of the page is relatively safe. Using i
|
|||
In-page search
|
||||
--------------
|
||||
|
||||
In-page search (e.g., using <kbd>Ctrl</kbd> + <kbd>s</kbd>) has been a basic feature in document readers well before browsers, and continues to be an essential feature today.
|
||||
In-page search (e.g., using <kbd>Ctrl</kbd> + <kbd>f</kbd>) has been a basic feature in document readers well before browsers, and continues to be an essential feature today.
|
||||
|
||||
Web pages that hide content behind "show content" widgets are difficult to search through: users need to toggle "show content" for each item they wish to search. Often, in-page search highlights are hidden; Reddit's atrocious redesign is a serious offender.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -976,7 +976,7 @@ Non-browsers: reading mode
|
|||
|
||||
Fully standards-compliant browsers aren't the only programs people use. They also use "reading mode" tools and services.
|
||||
|
||||
Reading modes leverage article extractors such as [Readability.js](https://github.com/mozilla/readability) (integrated into Firefox, Epiphany, Brave, Vivaldi, and others), [DOM Distiller](https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/dom-distiller/) (integrated into Chromium), and [Trafilatura](https://trafilatura.readthedocs.io/en/latest/) (powers a variety of tools and services). A host of other proprietary options exist: Diffbot powers services like Instapaper, Mozilla's Pocket has its own secret parsers, and countless "send to e-reader" services have amassed loyal users. Safari's proprietary fork of Readability has grown quite complex compared to upstream; Edge's Immersive Reader is [a mystery to me](https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/discussions/documentation-on-huerestics-used-during-article-distillation-in/m-p/3266436).
|
||||
Reading modes leverage article extractors such as [Readability.js](https://github.com/mozilla/readability) (integrated into Firefox, Epiphany, Brave, Vivaldi, and others), [DOM Distiller](https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/dom-distiller/) (integrated into Chromium), and [Trafilatura](https://trafilatura.readthedocs.io/en/latest/) (powers a variety of tools and services). A host of other proprietary options exist: Diffbot powers services like Instapaper, Mozilla's Pocket has its own secret parsers, and countless "send to e-reader" services have amassed loyal users. Safari's proprietary fork of Readability has grown quite complex compared to upstream; Edge's Immersive Reader is [a mystery to me](https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/discussions/documentation-on-huerestics-used-during-article-distillation-in/m-p/3266436), with [a problematic stylesheet](https://feedbackportal.microsoft.com/feedback/idea/e0d9b299-e3b6-ec11-a81c-000d3a7ce453).
|
||||
|
||||
I don't recommend catering to each tool's non-standard quirks. Studying their design reveals that they observe open standards, to varying degrees. Readability, DOM Distiller, and Trafilatura understand plain-old, semantic HTML (<abbr title="Plain-Old, Semantic HTML">POSH</abbr>).
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue