1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one synced 2024-12-24 17:52:11 +00:00

New note: on a more selective Google

This commit is contained in:
Seirdy 2024-07-19 01:03:27 -04:00
parent c53bd47ddf
commit e034da0225
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 1E892DB2A5F84479

View file

@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
---
title: "On a more selective Google"
date: 2024-07-19T01:03:27-04:00
replyURI: "https://www.vincentschmalbach.com/google-now-defaults-to-not-indexing-your-content/"
replyTitle: "Google Now Defaults to Not Indexing Your Content"
replyType: "BlogPosting"
replyAuthor: "Vincent Schmalbach"
replyAuthorURI: "https://www.vincentschmalbach.com/"
#syndicatedCopies:
# - title: 'The Fediverse'
# url: 'https://pleroma.envs.net/objects/931a72b0-09e9-42c8-b727-7b7a029b791c'
---
Selectivity is long overdue. Marginalia, Stract, and Teclis feel like a breath of fresh air for broad short-tail queries because they downrank or skip pages full of ads, trackers, scripts, and even SEO. However, Google's selectivity can't penalise such criteria as that would conflict with its ad business.
Google has a bias against new sites. This makes sense, given their spam potential. I disagree with your argument that a bias against new sites is a pivot away from [Experience, Expertise, authoritativeness, and trustworthiness (<abbr>EEAT</abbr>)](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/fundamentals/creating-helpful-content): it takes time for a website to become an authority and earn trust. If delayed indexing of new sites is wrong, then the problem lies with <abbr>EEAT</abbr>. I argue that <abbr>EEAT</abbr> is a good framework for an answer-focused engine, but a bad framework for a discovery- or surfing-focused engine like Marginalia or Wiby, respectively.