fmaury/seirdy.one
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one synced 2024-11-10 00:12:09 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

New note: what does x percent mean

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Rohan Kumar 2022-07-20 17:01:58 -07:00
parent 7ee5215e5e
commit dba55eba92
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 1E892DB2A5F84479
1 changed files with 17 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

17
content/notes/re-what-does-x-percent-of-issues-mean.md Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
---
title: "Re: what does x percent of issues mean?"
date: 2022-07-20T17:01:29-07:00
replyURI: "https://adrianroselli.com/2022/07/what-does-x-of-issues-mean.html"
replyTitle: "What Does X% of Issues Mean?"
replyType: "BlogPosting"
replyAuthor: "Adrian Rosell"
replyAuthorURI: "https://adrianroselli.com/"
---
Imagine asking a team of human auditors and disabled users to list all the accessibility issues they notice on a site. These people may list some WCAG failures, but might also list unique accessibility issues that aren't documented anywhere. They may phrase a single issue in a way that could cover a number of more specific issues (e.g. "this font makes my head hurt").
Then, run an automated scan on the same site. Combine the valid automated reported issues with the humans' reported issues. What percentage of this total could be addressed by the automated scan?
Repeat the exercise for a sample of sites, throw out the outliers, and average out the percentage. That's what "our tool catches <var>X%</var> of issues" could mean.
Now, I don't think most tools literally follow the process I described. I just described this example to illustrate the broader point that you don't need a "global list of issues" documented somewhere to make such a claim.