mirror of
https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one
synced 2024-12-24 01:42:10 +00:00
New thresholds since I added more bias sources
This commit is contained in:
parent
a2e2a2ed47
commit
c94beffddd
1 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions
|
@ -41,20 +41,20 @@ This post is an attempt to document how they are made, their differences, their
|
|||
|
||||
## How Tier-0 and FediNuke work
|
||||
|
||||
[My tier-0 list](https://seirdy.one/pb/tier0.csv) (mirrored to `tier0.csv` in [the Oliphant repository](https://codeberg.org/oliphant/blocklists)) is a subset of the `pleroma.envs.net` blocklist. It contains entries that appeared on at least **13 out of 24** other hand-picked instance blocklists ("bias sources"), with exceptions detailed below. Not all Tier-0 entries have the same level of severity; a smaller list containing what I personally deem the "worse half" of Tier 0 is [FediNuke.txt](https://seirdy.one/pb/FediNuke.txt). **Consensus** builds Tier-0; **severity** builds FediNuke.
|
||||
[My tier-0 list](https://seirdy.one/pb/tier0.csv) (mirrored to `tier0.csv` in [the Oliphant repository](https://codeberg.org/oliphant/blocklists)) is a subset of the `pleroma.envs.net` blocklist. It contains entries that appeared on at least **15 out of 28** other hand-picked instance blocklists ("bias sources"), with exceptions detailed below. Not all Tier-0 entries have the same level of severity; a smaller list containing what I personally deem the "worse half" of Tier 0 is [FediNuke.txt](https://seirdy.one/pb/FediNuke.txt). **Consensus** builds Tier-0; **severity** builds FediNuke.
|
||||
|
||||
When I add a bias source, I may also increase the minimum number of votes required if I find that its blocklist is too close to (or mainly just imports all of) tier-0 or the blocklist of a bias source's blocklist. That's the reason why the threshold is 13 instead of 12.
|
||||
When I add a bias source, I may also increase the minimum number of votes required if I find that its blocklist is too close to (or mainly just imports all of) tier-0 or the blocklist of a bias source's blocklist. That's the reason why the threshold is 15 instead of 14.
|
||||
|
||||
All entries use the root domains when applicable, or are as close to the root domain as possible without triggering false-positives.
|
||||
|
||||
### Overrides
|
||||
|
||||
There were some block-overrides for instances with fewer than 13 votes. Here's how I went about overriding:
|
||||
There were some block-overrides for instances with fewer than 15 votes. Here's how I went about overriding:
|
||||
|
||||
- If an instance has **11 votes,** I may elect to add it after additional review instead of waiting for it to hit 13 votes.
|
||||
- If an instance has **13 votes,** I may elect to add it after additional review instead of waiting for it to hit 15 votes.
|
||||
- If an instance is run by **the same staff as another Tier-0 instance** and has **at least 5 votes,** I may add it after asking other admins about it and getting multiple thumbs-up from admins who import tier-0.
|
||||
- If an instance contains **blatant/unapologetic bigotry** (something really undeniable, like Nazi imagery or excessive use of slurs in violent/hateful/definitely-not-reclaimed contexts) with staff approval or involvement, I may add it to both tier-0 and `FediNuke.txt` after I get multiple thumbs-up.
|
||||
- If an instance becomes **risky even to many tier-0 instances** (untagged gore, dox attempts, significant cybersecurity risk, <abbr title="child sexual exploitation material">CSEM</abbr>, etc. with staff approval or involvement): I may add it to both right away, skipping any process.
|
||||
- If an instance becomes **risky even to many tier-0 instances** (untagged gore, dox attempts, significant cybersecurity risk, <abbr title="child sexual abuse material">CSAM</abbr>, etc. with staff approval or involvement): I may add it to both right away, skipping any process.
|
||||
|
||||
Under ten controversial entries were excluded despite having more than enough votes, after consulting with other admins. Typically, these were instances that didn't pose a major safety risk, but did fail many admins' "vibe check" or exhibit major governance issues.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue