mirror of
https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one
synced 2024-12-25 02:02:11 +00:00
New note: EPUB and Web technology
This commit is contained in:
parent
19797ba6b0
commit
c854aad89d
1 changed files with 19 additions and 0 deletions
19
content/notes/epub-and-web-technology.md
Normal file
19
content/notes/epub-and-web-technology.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
title: "EPUB and Web technology"
|
||||
date: 2022-12-11T14:29:06-08:00
|
||||
replyURI: "https://fosstodon.org/@RL_Dane/109497272141002333"
|
||||
replyTitle: "A full webkit process and actual JS running just to view an epub"
|
||||
replyType: "SocialMediaPosting"
|
||||
replyAuthor: "R. L. Dane"
|
||||
replyAuthorURI: "https://fosstodon.org/@RL_Dane"
|
||||
---
|
||||
> The fact that I have to have a full WebKit process and actual JS running just to view an EPUB is really infuriating.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> Can't anything just be a ruddy DOCUMENT format anymore‽
|
||||
|
||||
To be fair: EPUB is actually a good use-case for semantic XHTML5, WAI-ARIA, DPUB-ARIA, MathML, and RDF serializations. This does call for some sort of web engine, but not necessarily a complete browser engine capable of running web apps.
|
||||
|
||||
Most of the rest of the Web platform beyond semantic markup and simple stylesheets should probably be stripped away from a typical EPUB reader. Unfortunately, few "slim" engines actually support enough of the features I described. Engines like Ultralight (proprietary) and [litehtml](https://github.com/litehtml/litehtml) come to mind, but I don't know how good the latter's accessibility support is.
|
||||
|
||||
I very much agree that JavaScript support in EPUB was a mistake; fortunately, it's seldom necessary. Signed JIT-less JavaScript as part of the e-reader program should be okay, as the user consented to run it.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue