fmaury/seirdy.one
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one synced 2024-11-27 14:12:09 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Address concerns around refreshes

Browse source 
See https://fosstodon.org/@gotofritz/110869804488136249
This commit is contained in:
Rohan Kumar 2023-08-11 10:21:29 -07:00
parent 9705bb4384
commit bdea6512ca
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 1E892DB2A5F84479
1 changed files with 4 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
content/posts/fediverse-blocklists.md
View file

@ -78,6 +78,10 @@ If `tier0.csv` were merely an unbiased list of the most widely blocked instances
Some instances migrate their domains. If the old instance was already deemed worthy of a suspension and the new instance maintains the same staff with no visible attempt to change its reputation, then I deem the new location to be as block-worthy as the old location and make an override. It's the same bad actors under a different banner.
### Refreshing
**Refreshes are a manual process.** Refreshes update my tier-0 list, but do not update FediNuke; that list is a manually-curated subset of my tier-0 list. Every time I refresh, I get prompted with changes (if they exist) so I can review them. Since my tier-0 is a subset of the pleroma.envs.net blocklist, all additions should have some level of approval from me already, but I've started giving new additions a second look anyway. Manual review, subsetting the pleroma.envs.net blocklist, having a large number of bias sources, and some level of vetting for my bias sources should mitigate the risk of one bias source "going rogue" and compromising its blocklist right before a refresh.
### Retractions
A separate list exists for retractions from my tier0.csv list. I don't add entries to my retractions list when I remove dead instances, or when an admin on a removed instance prefers not to be included in it (some wish to remain less prominent).