mirror of
https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one
synced 2024-11-10 00:12:09 +00:00
New Turkish engine
This commit is contained in:
parent
65c8710b61
commit
a6e3ee6e20
2 changed files with 8 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ These are large engines that pass all the above tests and more.
|
|||
* Epic Search (went paid-only by June 2021)
|
||||
* Occasionally powers DuckDuckGo’s link results instead of Bing.
|
||||
|
||||
4. Mojeek: Seems privacy-oriented with a large index containing billions of pages. Quality isn’t at Google/Bing/Yandex’s level, but it’s not bad either. If I had to use Mojeek as my default general search engine, I’d live. Partially powers eTools.ch. At this moment, I think that Mojeek is the best alternative to GBY.
|
||||
4. Mojeek: Seems privacy-oriented with a large index containing billions of pages. Quality isn’t at Google/Bing/Yandex’s level, but it’s not bad either. If I had to use Mojeek as my default general search engine, I’d live. Partially powers eTools.ch. At this moment, I think that Mojeek is the best alternative to GBY for general web search.
|
||||
|
||||
5. Petal search: A search engine by Huawei that recently switched from searching for Android apps to general search. Despite its surprisingly good results, I wouldn't recommend it due to privacy concerns. Requires an account to submit sites. I discovered this via my access logs. Be aware that in some jurisdictions, it doesn't use its own index: in Russia and some EU regions it uses Yandex and Qwant, respectively.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -230,11 +230,14 @@ I’m unable to evaluate these engines properly since I don’t speak the necess
|
|||
|
||||
### Smaller indexes
|
||||
|
||||
* Vuhuv: Turkish
|
||||
* Parsijoo: Persian
|
||||
* search.ch: Regional search engine for Switzerland; users can restrict searches to their local regions.
|
||||
* fastbot: German
|
||||
* Moose.at: German (Austria-based)
|
||||
|
||||
=> https://www.vuhuv.com.tr/ Vuhuv
|
||||
=> https://tr.vuhuv.com/ Yuhuv (alternate domain)
|
||||
=> https://www.parsijoo.ir/ Parsijoo
|
||||
=> https://search.ch search.ch
|
||||
=> https://www.fastbot.de/ fastbot
|
||||
|
@ -325,7 +328,7 @@ I tried to pick queries that should have a good number of results and show varia
|
|||
|
||||
Some less-mainstream engines have noticed this article, which is great! I've had excellent discussions with people who work on several of these engines. Unfortunately, this article's visibility also incentivizes some engines to optimize specifically for any methodology I describe. I've addressed this by keeping a long list of test queries to myself. The simple queries above are a decent starting point for simple quick evaluations, but I also test for common search operators, keyword length, and types of domain-specific jargon. I also use queries designed to pull up specific pages with varying levels of popularity and recency to gauge the size, scope, and growth of an index.
|
||||
|
||||
Professional critics often work anonymously because personalization can damage the integrity of their reviews. For similar reasons, I attempt to try each engine anonymously at least once by using a VPN and/or my standard anonymous setup: an amnesiac Whonix VM with the Tor Browser. I also often test using a fresh profile when travelling, or via a Searx instance if it supports a given engine. When avoiding personalization, I use "varied" queries that I don't repeat verbatim across search engines; this reduces the likelihood of identifying me. I also attempt to spread these tests out over time so admins won't notice an unusual uptick in unpredictable and esoteric searches.
|
||||
Professional critics often work anonymously because personalization can damage the integrity of their reviews. For similar reasons, I attempt to try each engine anonymously at least once by using a VPN and/or my standard anonymous setup: an amnesiac Whonix VM with the Tor Browser. I also often test using a fresh profile when travelling, or via a Searx instance if it supports a given engine. When avoiding personalization, I use "varied" queries that I don't repeat verbatim across search engines; this reduces the likelihood of identifying me. I also attempt to spread these tests out over time so admins won't notice an unusual uptick in unpredictable and esoteric searches. This might seem overkill, but I already regularly employ similar methods for a variety of different scenarios.
|
||||
|
||||
### Caveats
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ These are large engines that pass all the above tests and more.
|
|||
- Yandex: originally a Russian search engine, it now has an English version. Some Russian results bleed into its English site. Allows submitting pages and sitemaps for crawling, but requires login. Powers:
|
||||
- Epic Search (went paid-only as of June 2021)
|
||||
- Occasionally powers DuckDuckGo's link results instead of Bing.
|
||||
- Mojeek: Seems privacy-oriented with a large index containing billions of pages. Quality isn't at Google/Bing/Yandex's level, but it’s not bad either. If I had to use Mojeek as my default general search engine, I'd live. Partially powers [eTools.ch](https://www.etools.ch/). At this moment, I think that Mojeek is the best alternative to GBY.
|
||||
- [Mojeek](https://www.mojeek.com/): Seems privacy-oriented with a large index containing billions of pages. Quality isn't at Google/Bing/Yandex's level, but it’s not bad either. If I had to use Mojeek as my default general search engine, I'd live. Partially powers [eTools.ch](https://www.etools.ch/). At this moment, _I think that Mojeek is the best alternative to GBY_ for general search.
|
||||
- [Petal Search](https://petalsearch.com/). A search engine by Huawei that recently switched from searching for Android apps to general search in order to reduce dependence on Western search providers. Despite its surprisingly good results, I wouldn't recommend it due to privacy concerns. Requires an account to submit sites. I discovered this via my access logs. Be aware that in some jurisdictions, it doesn't use its own index: in Russia and some EU regions it uses Yandex and Qwant, respectively.
|
||||
|
||||
### Smaller indexes, relevant results
|
||||
|
@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ I'm unable to evaluate these engines properly since I don't speak the necessary
|
|||
|
||||
### Smaller indexes
|
||||
|
||||
- [Vuhuv](https://www.vuhuv.com.tr/): Turkish. [alt domain](https://tr.vuhuv.com/)
|
||||
- [Parsijoo](https://www.parsijoo.ir/): Persian
|
||||
- [search.ch](https://search.ch): Regional search engine for Switzerland; users can restrict searches to their local regions.
|
||||
- [fastbot](https://www.fastbot.de/): German
|
||||
|
@ -237,7 +238,7 @@ I tried to pick queries that should have a good number of results and show varia
|
|||
|
||||
Some less-mainstream engines have noticed this article, which is great! I've had excellent discussions with people who work on several of these engines. Unfortunately, this article's visibility also incentivizes some engines to optimize specifically for any methodology I describe. I've addressed this by keeping a long list of test queries to myself. The simple queries above are a decent starting point for simple quick evaluations, but I also test for common search operators, keyword length, and types of domain-specific jargon. I also use queries designed to pull up specific pages with varying levels of popularity and recency to gauge the size, scope, and growth of an index.
|
||||
|
||||
Professional critics often work anonymously because personalization can damage the integrity of their reviews. For similar reasons, I attempt to try each engine anonymously at least once by using a VPN and/or my standard anonymous setup: an amnesiac Whonix VM with the Tor Browser. I also often test using a fresh profile when travelling, or via a Searx instance if it supports a given engine. When avoiding personalization, I use "varied" queries that I don't repeat verbatim across search engines; this reduces the likelihood of identifying me. I also attempt to spread these tests out over time so admins won't notice an unusual uptick in unpredictable and esoteric searches.
|
||||
Professional critics often work anonymously because personalization can damage the integrity of their reviews. For similar reasons, I attempt to try each engine anonymously at least once by using a VPN and/or my standard anonymous setup: an amnesiac Whonix VM with the Tor Browser. I also often test using a fresh profile when travelling, or via a Searx instance if it supports a given engine. When avoiding personalization, I use "varied" queries that I don't repeat verbatim across search engines; this reduces the likelihood of identifying me. I also attempt to spread these tests out over time so admins won't notice an unusual uptick in unpredictable and esoteric searches. This might seem overkill, but I already regularly employ similar methods for a variety of different scenarios.
|
||||
|
||||
### Caveats
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue