mirror of
https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one
synced 2024-11-27 22:12:10 +00:00
New note: Yuescript first impressions
This commit is contained in:
parent
e8ab433b22
commit
a3dd303b48
1 changed files with 11 additions and 0 deletions
11
content/notes/yuescript-first-impressions.md
Normal file
11
content/notes/yuescript-first-impressions.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
title: "Yuescript first impressions"
|
||||||
|
date: 2023-02-15T09:35:15-08:00
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
I just discovered [Yuescript](https://yuescript.org/doc/), which is like MoonScript with more features. I have mixed feelings.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I like features like pipelines (much cleaner than repeated assignment or nested parentheses in function calls) and compile-time macros. The sugar for multiple and destructuring assignment is handy.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I find the additional operators unnecessary, and not worth their cognitive overhead. The `?` operator was already used as sugar for a parameter-free function call. The `[]` operator could easily have been a function in a library instead.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
One of the trade-offs for this much syntactic sugar is some syntactic ambiguity. An opinionated formatter could resolve some of this.
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue