fmaury/seirdy.one
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one synced 2024-11-12 16:52:11 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Clarify that branding isn't evil

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
rohan kumar 2020-11-24 10:58:05 -08:00
parent 2d43a0ddc4
commit a1f517c61a
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 1E892DB2A5F84479
2 changed files with 6 additions and 5 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
content/posts/website-best-practices.gmi
View file

@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ Early rough drafts of this post generated some feedback I thought I should addre
If you really want, you could use serif instead of sans-serif, but serif fonts tend to look worse on low-res monitors. Not every screen's DPI has three digits.
To ship custom fonts is to assert that branding is more important than user choice. Beyond basic layout and optionally supporting dark mode, authors should not dictate the presentation of their websites; that is the job of the user agent. Most websites are not important enough to look completely different from the rest of the user's system.
To ship custom fonts is to assert that branding is more important than user choice. That might very well be a reasonable thing to do; branding isn't evil! It isn't *usually* the case for textual websites, though. Beyond basic layout and optionally supporting dark mode, authors generally shouldn't dictate the presentation of their websites; that is the job of the user agent. Most websites are not important enough to look completely different from the rest of the user's system.
A personal example: I set my preferred fonts in my computer's fontconfig settings. Now every website that uses sans-serif will have my preferred font. Sites with sans-serif blend into the users' systems instead of sticking out.

9
content/posts/website-best-practices.md
View file

@ -56,10 +56,11 @@ If you *really* want, you could use `serif` instead of `sans-serif`, but serif f
tend to look worse on low-res monitors. Not every screen's DPI has three digits.
To ship custom fonts is to assert that branding is more important than user choice.
Beyond basic layout and optionally supporting dark mode, authors should not dictate
the presentation of their websites; that is the job of the user agent. Most websites
are not important enough to look completely different from the rest of the user's
system.
That might very well be a reasonable thing to do; branding isn't evil! It isn't
*usually* the case for textual websites, though. Beyond basic layout and optionally
supporting dark mode, authors generally shouldn't dictate the presentation of their
websites; that is the job of the user agent. Most websites are not important enough
to look completely different from the rest of the user's system.
A personal example: I set my preferred fonts in my computer's fontconfig settings.
Now every website that uses `sans-serif` will have my preferred font. Sites with