mirror of
https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one
synced 2024-12-24 17:52:11 +00:00
Update info on existing search engines
- Infotiger and seekport are improving. - Right Dao seems to be missing recent results compared to others in its section.
This commit is contained in:
Rohan Kumar
parent
bb568bce1f
commit
931229e5e3
2 changed files with 13 additions and 13 deletions
|
|
@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ Google, Bing, and Yandex support structured data such as microformats1, microdat
|
|||
|
||||
These engines pass most of the tests listed in the "methodology" section. All of them seem relatively privacy-friendly. I wouldn't recommend using these engines to find specific answers; they're better for learning about a topic by finding interesting pages related to a set of keywords.
|
||||
|
||||
* Right Dao: very fast, good results. Passes the tests fairly well. It plans on including query-based ads if/when its userbase grows.⁸ For the past few months, its index seems to have focused more on large, established sites rather than smaller, independent ones.
|
||||
* Right Dao: very fast, good results. Passes the tests fairly well. It plans on including query-based ads if/when its userbase grows.⁸ For the past few months, its index seems to have focused more on large, established sites rather than smaller, independent ones. It seems to be a bit lacking in more recent pages.
|
||||
=> https://rightdao.com Right Dao
|
||||
|
||||
* Gigablast: It’s been around for a while and also sports a classic web directory. Searches are a bit slow, and it charges to submit sites for crawling. It powers Private.sh. Gigablast is tied with Right Dao for quality.
|
||||
|
|
@ -104,16 +104,17 @@ Yep supports Open Graph and some JSON-LD at the moment. A look through the sourc
|
|||
|
||||
These engines fail badly at a few important tests. Otherwise, they seem to work well enough.
|
||||
|
||||
* seekport: The interface is in German but it supports searching in English just fine. The default language is selected by your locale. It’s really good considering its small index; it hasn’t heard of less common terms (e.g. “Seirdy”), but it’s able to find relevant results in other tests. The server does not support TLS.
|
||||
* Infotiger: My favorite engine in this section. It offers advanced result filtering and sports a somewhat large index. It allows site submission for English and German pages. The fastest-improving engine in this section; I look forward to the day it "graduates" to the previous section. Infotiger also has a Tor hidden service.
|
||||
* seekport: The interface is in German but it supports searching in English just fine. The default language is selected by your locale. It’s really good considering its small index; it hasn’t heard of less common terms. but it’s able to find relevant results in other tests. It's the second-fastest-improving engines in this section.
|
||||
* Exalead: slow, quality is hit-and-miss. Its indexer claims to crawl the DMOZ directory, which has since shut down and been replaced by the Curlie directory. No relevant results for “Oppenheimer” and some other history-related queries. Allows submitting individual URLs for indexing, but requires solving a Google reCAPTCHA and entering an email address.
|
||||
* ExactSeek: small index, disproportionately dominated by big sites. Failed multiple tests. Allows submitting individual URLs for crawling, but requires entering an email address and receiving a newsletter. Webmaster tools seem to heavily push for paid SEO options. It also powers SitesOnDisplay and Blog-search.com.
|
||||
* Infotiger: A small index that seems to find relevant results. It allows site submission for English and German pages. It also features a "similarity" search to query pages similar to a given link, with mixed results.
|
||||
|
||||
=> http://www.seekport.com/ seekport (HTTP only)
|
||||
=> https://www.exalead.com/search/ Exalead
|
||||
=> https://curlie.org Curlie
|
||||
=> https://www.exactseek.com/ ExactSeek
|
||||
=> https://alpha.infotiger.com/ Infotiger
|
||||
=> https://infotiger.com/ Infotiger
|
||||
=> http://infotiger4xywbfq45mvd5drh43jpqeurakg2ya7gqwvjf2bbwnixzqd.onion/ Infotiger hidden service
|
||||
=> http://www.seekport.com/ seekport (HTTP only)
|
||||
=> https://www.exalead.com/search/ Exalead
|
||||
=> https://curlie.org Curlie
|
||||
=> https://www.exactseek.com/ ExactSeek
|
||||
|
||||
* Burf.co: Very small index, but seems fine at ranking more relevant results higher. Allows site submission without any extra steps.
|
||||
* Entfer: a newcomer that lets registered users upvote/downvote search results to customize ranking. Doesn't offer much information about who made it. Its index is small, but it does seem to return results related to the query.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -130,11 +130,13 @@ Yep supports Open Graph and some JSON-LD at the moment. A look through the sourc
|
|||
|
||||
### Smaller indexes, hit-and-<wbr />miss {#smaller-indexes-hit-and-miss}
|
||||
|
||||
These engines fail badly at a few important tests. Otherwise, they seem to work well enough.
|
||||
These engines fail badly at a few important tests. Otherwise, they seem to work well enough for users who'd like some more serendipity in less-specific searches.
|
||||
|
||||
[Infotiger](https://alpha.infotiger.com/)
|
||||
: My favorite engine in this section. It offers advanced result filtering and sports a somewhat large index. It allows site submission for English and German pages. The fastest-improving engine in this section: I use it often to discover new sites, and look forward to the day it "graduates" to the previous section. [Infotier has a Tor hidden service](http://infotiger4xywbfq45mvd5drh43jpqeurakg2ya7gqwvjf2bbwnixzqd.onion/).
|
||||
|
||||
[seekport](http://www.seekport.com/)
|
||||
: The interface is in German but it supports searching in English just fine. The default language is selected by your locale. It's really good considering its small index; it hasn't heard of less common terms (e.g. "Seirdy"), but it's able to find relevant results in other tests.
|
||||
: The interface is in German but it supports searching in English just fine. The default language is selected by your locale. It’s really good considering its small index; it hasn’t heard of less common terms. but it’s able to find relevant results in other tests. It's the second-fastest-improving engines in this section.
|
||||
|
||||
[Exalead](https://www.exalead.com/search/)
|
||||
: Slow, quality is hit-and-miss. Its indexer claims to crawl the DMOZ directory, which has since shut down and been replaced by the [Curlie](https://curlie.org) directory. No relevant results for "Oppenheimer" and some other history-related queries. Allows submitting individual URLs for indexing, but requires solving a Google reCAPTCHA and entering an email address.
|
||||
|
|
@ -142,9 +144,6 @@ These engines fail badly at a few important tests. Otherwise, they seem to work
|
|||
[ExactSeek](https://www.exactseek.com/)
|
||||
: Small index, disproportionately dominated by big sites. Failed multiple tests. Allows submitting individual URLs for crawling, but requires entering an email address and receiving a newsletter. Webmaster tools seem to heavily push for paid <abbr title="search-engine optimization">SEO</abbr> options. It also powers SitesOnDisplay and [Blog-<wbr />search.com](https://www.blog-search.com).
|
||||
|
||||
[Infotiger](https://alpha.infotiger.com/)
|
||||
: A small index that seems to find relevant results. It allows site submission for English and German pages. It also features a "similarity" search to query pages similar to a given link, with mixed results.
|
||||
|
||||
[Burf.co](https://burf.co/)
|
||||
: Very small index, but seems fine at ranking more relevant results higher. Allows site submission without any extra steps.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue