mirror of
https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one
synced 2024-11-23 21:02:09 +00:00
Corrections about Eloquence
This commit is contained in:
parent
f760470fef
commit
91117258bf
2 changed files with 6 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ I recently had a chat with Matt on IRC about screen readers and different types
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
=> https://github.com/espeak-ng/espeak-ng/ eSpeak NG Git repository
|
=> https://github.com/espeak-ng/espeak-ng/ eSpeak NG Git repository
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Downloads of Eloquence are easy to find (it’s even included with the JAWS screen reader), but I struggle to find any “official” pages about the original Eloquence. Nuance acquired Eloquent Technologies, the developer of Eloquence. Microsoft later acquired Nuance.
|
Downloads of Eloquence are easy to find (it’s even included with the JAWS screen reader), but I struggle to find any “official” pages about the original Eloquence. Nuance acquired Eloquent Technology, the developer of Eloquence. Microsoft later acquired Nuance.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
I like the Eloquence speech synthesizer. It sounds similar to the robotic yet predictable voice of my beloved eSpeak NG, but with improved overall quality. Unfortunately, Eloquence is proprietary.
|
I like the Eloquence speech synthesizer. It sounds similar to the robotic yet predictable voice of my beloved eSpeak NG, but with improved overall quality. Unfortunately, Eloquence is proprietary.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ If this succeeds, we have new legal justification that GitHub Copilot is illegal
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Our goal here is to get the same legal outcome as the low-stakes “trial run” of Part One.
|
Our goal here is to get the same legal outcome as the low-stakes “trial run” of Part One.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Microsoft owns Nuance. Nuance previously bought Eloquent Technologies, the developers of the Eloquence speech synthesizer.
|
Microsoft owns Nuance. Nuance previously bought Eloquent Technology, the developers of the Eloquence speech synthesizer.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
1. Repeat Part One against Nuance speech synthesizers, including Eloquence. Go to court.
|
1. Repeat Part One against Nuance speech synthesizers, including Eloquence. Go to court.
|
||||||
2. Have the ruling from Part One cited as legal precedent.
|
2. Have the ruling from Part One cited as legal precedent.
|
||||||
|
@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ Either way, it’s an absolute win for free software. Taking down Copilot protec
|
||||||
## Corrections
|
## Corrections
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
It's come to my attention that Eloquence may or may not still belong to Nuance. Further research is needed.
|
It's come to my attention that Eloquence may or may not still belong to Nuance. Further research is needed.
|
||||||
|
Eloquent Technology was acquired by SpeechWorks in 2000.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Footnotes
|
## Footnotes
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ GitHub performed its own research into the matter.[^2] You can read about it on
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
I recently had a chat with Matt on IRC about screen readers and different types of speech synthesizers. I mentioned that while I do like some variety, I always find myself returning to the underrated robotic voice of [eSpeak NG](https://github.com/espeak-ng/espeak-ng/). He shared some of my fondness, and also shared his preference for a similar speech synthesizer called Eloquence.
|
I recently had a chat with Matt on IRC about screen readers and different types of speech synthesizers. I mentioned that while I do like some variety, I always find myself returning to the underrated robotic voice of [eSpeak NG](https://github.com/espeak-ng/espeak-ng/). He shared some of my fondness, and also shared his preference for a similar speech synthesizer called Eloquence.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Downloads of Eloquence are easy to find (it's even included with the JAWS screen reader), but I struggle to find any "official" pages about the original Eloquence. Nuance acquired Eloquent Technologies, the developer of Eloquence. Microsoft later acquired Nuance.
|
Downloads of Eloquence are easy to find (it's even included with the JAWS screen reader), but I struggle to find any "official" pages about the original Eloquence. Nuance acquired Eloquent Technology, the developer of Eloquence. Microsoft later acquired Nuance.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
{{<transcribed-image id="eloquence" type="audio" itemtype2="AudioObject" itemprop="hasPart">}}
|
{{<transcribed-image id="eloquence" type="audio" itemtype2="AudioObject" itemprop="hasPart">}}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ If this succeeds, we have new legal justification that GitHub Copilot is illegal
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Our goal here is to get the same legal outcome as the low-stakes "trial run" of Part One.
|
Our goal here is to get the same legal outcome as the low-stakes "trial run" of Part One.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Microsoft owns Nuance. Nuance previously bought Eloquent Technologies, the developers of the Eloquence speech synthesizer.
|
Microsoft owns Nuance. Nuance previously bought Eloquent Technology, the developers of the Eloquence speech synthesizer.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
1. Repeat Part One against Nuance speech synthesizers, including Eloquence. Go to court.
|
1. Repeat Part One against Nuance speech synthesizers, including Eloquence. Go to court.
|
||||||
2. Have the ruling from Part One cited as legal precedent.
|
2. Have the ruling from Part One cited as legal precedent.
|
||||||
|
@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ Corrections
|
||||||
-----------
|
-----------
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
It's come to my attention that Eloquence may or may not still belong to Nuance. Further research is needed.
|
It's come to my attention that Eloquence may or may not still belong to Nuance. Further research is needed.
|
||||||
|
Eloquent Technology was acquired by SpeechWorks in 2000.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
</section>
|
</section>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue