1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one synced 2024-11-10 00:12:09 +00:00

New note: Big Tech nameservers

This commit is contained in:
Rohan Kumar 2022-08-10 21:30:20 -07:00
parent 4f78d1b6ef
commit 8855efc043
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 1E892DB2A5F84479

View file

@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
---
title: "Big Tech nameservers"
date: 2022-08-10T21:30:17-07:00
---
Many people are worried about Amazon Web Services and especially Cloudflare centralizing the Web. I generally share their concerns, with one exception.
Hot take: it's fine to use a "Big Tech" provider **as a name server,** provided you can handle the 24-hour delay involved in a migration. Of all things, using a name server doesn't have nearly the same the drawbacks as other types of centralization. It's super easy to migrate, and DNSSEC keep name servers honest. There are more important things to worry about.
I'll switch to Cloudflare *just for DNS,* because it's one of the only providers that supports DNSSEC and the new HTTPS records. The latter will be useful once a web server finally gains Encrypted Client Hello support; I'm watching Nginx, OpenLiteSpeed, H2O, redbean, and Caddy.