fmaury/seirdy.one
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one synced 2024-11-23 21:02:09 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Manually fix changed/irregular links

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Rohan Kumar 2022-11-17 17:02:22 -08:00
parent f4fa660230
commit 80b6563b2f
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 1E892DB2A5F84479
7 changed files with 8 additions and 8 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
content/about/uses.md
View file

@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ jq
[htmltest](https://github.com/wjdp/htmltest) OR [html-proofer](https://github.com/gjtorikian/html-proofer) [htmltest](https://github.com/wjdp/htmltest) OR [html-proofer](https://github.com/gjtorikian/html-proofer)
: Two very similar tools. html-proofer is slow but supports more features; I run the faster htmltest more often. They check for broken links, markup errors, and valid icons. htmltest's ability to cache links is really useful: instead of testing nearly two thousand links every run, I can spread the load over the course of a week. It's also much easier to build a static binary of htmltest than other link-checkers, like Lychee. : Two very similar tools. html-proofer is slow but supports more features; I run the faster htmltest more often. They check for broken links, markup errors, and valid icons. htmltest's ability to cache links is really useful: instead of testing nearly two thousand links every run, I can spread the load over the course of a week. It's also much easier to build a static binary of htmltest than other link-checkers, like Lychee.
[webhint](https://webhint.io) [webhint](https://webhint.io/)
: When all the aforementioned tests pass, my staging site deploys and webhint runs on every page in its sitemap. Webhint checks HTTP headers, validates the Web App Manifest, ensures caching and compression work, checks for compatibility issues, validates compliance with a performance budget, and looks for common HTML/CSS mistakes. I skip its axe-based tests, since those are already covered by axe-core. : When all the aforementioned tests pass, my staging site deploys and webhint runs on every page in its sitemap. Webhint checks HTTP headers, validates the Web App Manifest, ensures caching and compression work, checks for compatibility issues, validates compliance with a performance budget, and looks for common HTML/CSS mistakes. I skip its axe-based tests, since those are already covered by axe-core.
Tools I have yet to add to this section: Tools I have yet to add to this section:

4
content/meta/site-design.md
View file

@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ I also accept user feedback. Feel free to contact me through any means linked on
The following automated tools supplement manual testing: The following automated tools supplement manual testing:
- [axe-core](https://github.com/dequelabs/axe-core) - [axe-core](https://github.com/dequelabs/axe-core)
- [IBM Equal Access Accessibility Checker](https://www.ibm.com/able/toolkit/verify/automated) - [IBM Equal Access Accessibility Checker](https://www.ibm.com/able/toolkit/verify/automated/)
- [AInspector](https://github.com/ainspector/ainspector-for-firefox) - [AInspector](https://github.com/ainspector/ainspector-for-firefox)
- [WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool](https://wave.webaim.org/) - [WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool](https://wave.webaim.org/)
- [ARC Toolkit](https://www.tpgi.com/arc-platform/arc-toolkit/) - [ARC Toolkit](https://www.tpgi.com/arc-platform/arc-toolkit/)
@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ I've implemented several features from IndieMark:
- Microformats: representative `h-card`, in-text `h-card` and `h-cite` when referencing works, `h-feed`. - Microformats: representative `h-card`, in-text `h-card` and `h-cite` when referencing works, `h-feed`.
- Sending and receiving Webmentions. I receive Webmentions with [webmentiond](https://github.com/zerok/webmentiond), and send them from my own computer using [Pushl](https://github.com/PlaidWeb/Pushl). - Sending and receiving Webmentions. I receive Webmentions with [webmentiond](https://github.com/zerok/webmentiond), and send them from my own computer using [Pushl](https://github.com/PlaidWeb/Pushl/).
- Displaying Webmentions: I render backlinks, IndieWeb "likes" (not silo likes), and comments below posts. I model their appearance after Tumblr's display of interactions. - Displaying Webmentions: I render backlinks, IndieWeb "likes" (not silo likes), and comments below posts. I model their appearance after Tumblr's display of interactions.

2
content/notes/re-debunking-myths-about-https.md
View file

@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
--- ---
title: "Re: debunking myths about HTTPS" title: "Re: debunking myths about HTTPS"
date: 2022-09-19T14:39:08-07:00 date: 2022-09-19T14:39:08-07:00
replyURI: "https://blog.julien-maury.dev/en/snippets/https-myths/" replyURI: "https://web.archive.org/web/20220919214257/https://blog.julien-maury.dev/en/snippets/https-myths/"
replyTitle: "Debunking myths about HTTPS" replyTitle: "Debunking myths about HTTPS"
replyType: "Article" replyType: "Article"
replyAuthor: "Julien Maury" replyAuthor: "Julien Maury"

2
content/notes/resize-and-reflow.md
View file

@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ replyURI: "https://yatil.net/blog/resize-text-reflow"
replyTitle: "WCAG SC 1.4.4 Resize Text and 1.4.10 Reflow" replyTitle: "WCAG SC 1.4.4 Resize Text and 1.4.10 Reflow"
replyType: "BlogPosting" replyType: "BlogPosting"
replyAuthor: "Eric Eggert" replyAuthor: "Eric Eggert"
replyAuthorURI: "https://yatil.net" replyAuthorURI: "https://yatil.net/"
--- ---
This is a good article on the difference between SC 1.4.4 and 1.4.10. However, I don't think these criteria go far enough: This is a good article on the difference between SC 1.4.4 and 1.4.10. However, I don't think these criteria go far enough:

2
content/posts/keeping-platforms-open.md
View file

@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ The reason societies with democratic governments are better places to live in th
</blockquote> </blockquote>
{{<quotecaption partOfType="OpinionNewsArticle">}} {{<quotecaption partOfType="OpinionNewsArticle">}}
{{<indieweb-person first-name="Nathan" last-name="Myhrvold" url="http://www.nathanmyhrvold.com/" itemprop="author">}}, {{<indieweb-person first-name="Nathan" last-name="Myhrvold" url="https://www.nathanmyhrvold.com/" itemprop="author">}},
{{<cited-work name="The Virtue of Inefficient Government" url="https://slate.com/news-and-politics/1996/10/the-virtue-of-inefficient-government.html" extraName="headline">}} {{<cited-work name="The Virtue of Inefficient Government" url="https://slate.com/news-and-politics/1996/10/the-virtue-of-inefficient-government.html" extraName="headline">}}
{{</quotecaption>}} {{</quotecaption>}}
{{</quotation>}} {{</quotation>}}

2
content/posts/website-best-practices.gmi
View file

@ -1770,7 +1770,7 @@ If you've got some time on your hands, I *highly* recommend reading the WCAG:
The WCAG 2 standard is technology-neutral, so it doesn't contain Web-specific advice. For that, check the the how-to quick reference. It combines the WCAG with its supplementary list of techniques: The WCAG 2 standard is technology-neutral, so it doesn't contain Web-specific advice. For that, check the the how-to quick reference. It combines the WCAG with its supplementary list of techniques:
=> https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/quickref How to Meet WCAG (Quick Reference) => https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/quickref/ How to Meet WCAG (Quick Reference)
=> https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Techniques/ Techniques for WCAG 2.2 => https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Techniques/ Techniques for WCAG 2.2
The WCAG are an excellent starting point for learning about accessibility, but make for a poor stopping point. Much of the content on this page simply isn't covered by the WCAG. One of my favorite resources for learning about what the WCAG *doesn't* cover is Axess Lab: The WCAG are an excellent starting point for learning about accessibility, but make for a poor stopping point. Much of the content on this page simply isn't covered by the WCAG. One of my favorite resources for learning about what the WCAG *doesn't* cover is Axess Lab:

2
content/posts/website-best-practices.md
View file

@ -1841,7 +1841,7 @@ The [Web Bloat Score calculator](https://www.webbloatscore.com/) is a JavaScript
One resource I found useful (that eventually featured this article!) was the "Your page content" section of {{<mention-work itemprop="citation" itemtype="TechArticle">}}{{<cited-work name="Your Personal Website" url="https://www.billdietrich.me/YourPersonalWebSite.html" extraName="headline">}} by {{<indieweb-person first-name="Bill" last-name="Dietrich" url="https://www.billdietrich.me" itemprop="author">}}{{</mention-work>}}. One resource I found useful (that eventually featured this article!) was the "Your page content" section of {{<mention-work itemprop="citation" itemtype="TechArticle">}}{{<cited-work name="Your Personal Website" url="https://www.billdietrich.me/YourPersonalWebSite.html" extraName="headline">}} by {{<indieweb-person first-name="Bill" last-name="Dietrich" url="https://www.billdietrich.me" itemprop="author">}}{{</mention-work>}}.
If you've got some time on your hands, I _highly_ recommend reading the <cite>[Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG)&nbsp;2.2](https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/)</cite>. The WCAG 2 standard is technology-neutral, so it doesn't contain Web-specific advice. For that, check the <cite>[How to Meet WCAG (Quick Reference)](https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/quickref)</cite>. It combines the WCAG with its supplementary [list of techniques](https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Techniques/). If you've got some time on your hands, I _highly_ recommend reading the <cite>[Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG)&nbsp;2.2](https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/)</cite>. The WCAG 2 standard is technology-neutral, so it doesn't contain Web-specific advice. For that, check the <cite>[How to Meet WCAG (Quick Reference)](https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/quickref/)</cite>. It combines the WCAG with its supplementary [list of techniques](https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Techniques/).
The WCAG are an excellent starting point for learning about accessibility, but make for a poor stopping point. Much of the content on this page simply isn't covered by the WCAG. One of my favorite resources for learning about what the WCAG _doesn't_ cover is [Axess Lab's articles](https://axesslab.com/articles/). The WCAG are an excellent starting point for learning about accessibility, but make for a poor stopping point. Much of the content on this page simply isn't covered by the WCAG. One of my favorite resources for learning about what the WCAG _doesn't_ cover is [Axess Lab's articles](https://axesslab.com/articles/).