fmaury/seirdy.one
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one synced 2024-09-19 20:02:10 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

typo

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Rohan Kumar 2022-09-12 10:21:18 -07:00
parent f23d8faa3d
commit 6d034c180d
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 1E892DB2A5F84479
1 changed files with 4 additions and 2 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

6
content/notes/re-water-usage-infographic.md
View file

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
---
title: "Re: water usage infographic"
date: 2022-09-12T10:07:03-07:00
date: 2022-09-12T10:14:03-07:00
replyURI: "https://akkos.fritu.re/notice/ANUcbQMnRMMTgaE9fU"
replyTitle: "The amount of water other food need to produce 1kg of food"
replyType: "SocialMediaPosting"
@ -10,8 +10,10 @@ replyAuthorURI: "https://comfitu.re/"
I have mixed feelings about infographics that reduce ecological footprints to single scalar non-fungible values.
Infographics like these should have a second metric for "average rainfall in areas producing requires ingredients", since water isn't fungible. Chocolate wouldn't look as bad then.
Infographics like these should have a second metric for "average rainfall in areas producing required ingredients", since water isn't fungible. Chocolate wouldn't look as bad then.
And a third metric for fuel required to import the food and ingredients during production. Chocolate would look bad again, since it's typically produced far away from where cacao grows. Maybe this should be generated based on a viewer's approximate location, to better account for shipping.
Also, this infographic ignores serving size by measuring the same mass of all these different foods. I'm not sure who buys equal masses of chocolate and rice.
([Original infographic source](https://www.tromsite.com/books/#flipbook-df_6707/34))