1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one synced 2024-11-10 00:12:09 +00:00

Improve + talk about image transcripts some more

This commit is contained in:
Rohan Kumar 2022-04-20 17:36:02 -07:00
parent 8d1fa33d0c
commit 50c3ec981c
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 1E892DB2A5F84479
2 changed files with 29 additions and 4 deletions

View file

@ -511,7 +511,13 @@ A "longdesc" attribute used to be another way to reference an image transcript.
=> https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/obsolete.html#non-conforming-features HTML Living Standard: non-conforming features
The recommended way to link to a transcript is by hyperlinking the image (i.e., wrapping it with <a>). Put a short summary in the alt-text, and mention that the hyperlink contains a transcript.
The recommended way to link to a transcript is by hyperlinking the image (i.e., wrapping it with <a>) or semantically grouping the image with its transcript. Put a short summary in the alt-text, and mention the availability of a transcript. I do this by adding a transcript in a <details> element at the end of a <figcaption>.
A StackOverflow thread about comic transcripts outlines a good approach to semantically group images and transcripts, but I disagree with their interpretation of <figcaption>:
=> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65564539/what-is-the-semantically-correct-way-to-include-transcript-from-a-comic What is the semantically correct way to include transcript from a comic?
Nothing in the spec seems to imply that appending a <details> element to the end of a <figcaption> would be improper. Adding <details> to a caption seems to tick all the right boxes: the <figcaption> has semantics indicating a description of the <figure> content; the figure, caption, and transcript are visually close together; and <details> indicates additional hidden-by-default information without presenting it to uninterested readers. Other information is available in the alt-text, surrounding context, and rest of the caption; a blind reader who got the necessary information should only have to expand the transcript if they're interested enough. Having an unusually long caption seems like a small price to pay.
The xkcd comic included earlier in the page had this alt-text:

View file

@ -318,10 +318,27 @@ One example is pagination. It's easier to download one long article ahead of tim
Another common offender is infinite-scrolling. In addition to requiring JavaScript, infinite-scrolling also makes it difficult for readers to find their old place upon re-visiting a page. This creates harsh consequences for accidental navigation. WordPress documentation [lists more problems](https://make.wordpress.org/accessibility/handbook/markup/infinite-scroll/)[^6].
<figure>
{{< picture name="infinite_scrolling" alt="Comic: if books had infinite-scroll, we'd have to turn pages carefully or risk losing the page. Transcript in caption.">}}
{{< picture name="infinite_scrolling" alt="Comic: if books had infinite-scroll, we'd have to turn pages carefully or risk losing the page. Transcript in caption." >}}
<figcaption>
Infinite-scrolling means that accidentally navigating to a link will result in losing your place. Source: [xkcd](https://xkcd.com/1309/). Transcript [on the "explain xkcd" wiki](https://explainxkcd.com/1309/#Transcript).
Infinite-scrolling means that accidentally navigating to a link will result in losing your place. Source: [xkcd](https://xkcd.com/1309/).
<details>
<summary>Transcript</summary>
Megan stands at a desk, reading a book, touching it very gingerly. Cueball is standing behind her.
Cueball
: Why are you turning the pages like that?
Megan
: If I touch the wrong thing, I'll lose my place and have to start over.
Caption below the panel
: If books worked like infinite-scrolling webpages
</details>
</figcaption>
</figure>
@ -528,7 +545,9 @@ If the image is a screenshot of text from a website, link to that website to all
A <dfn>`longdesc`</dfn> attribute used to be another way to reference an image transcript. The `longdesc` attribute contained a hyperlink (often an anchor link) to a location with more information about an image. This attribute [has been obsoleted](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/obsolete.html#non-conforming-features) in the HTML Living Standard.
The recommended way to link to a transcript is by hyperlinking the image (i.e., wrapping it with `<a>`). Put a short summary in the alt-text, and mention that the hyperlink contains a transcript.
The recommended way to link to a transcript is by hyperlinking the image (i.e., wrapping it with `<a>`) or semantically grouping the image with its transcript. Put a short summary in the alt-text, and mention the availability of a transcript. I do this by adding a transcript in a `<details>` element at the end of a `<figcaption>`.
A [StackOverflow thread about comic transcripts](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65564539/what-is-the-semantically-correct-way-to-include-transcript-from-a-comic) outlines a good approach to semantically group images and transcripts, but I disagree with their interpretation of `<figcaption>`. Nothing in the spec seems to imply that appending a `<details>` element to the end of a `<figcaption>` would be improper. Adding `<details>` to a caption seems to tick all the right boxes: the `<figcaption>` has semantics indicating a description of the `<figure>` content; the figure, caption, and transcript are visually close together; and `<details>` indicates additional hidden-by-default information without presenting it to uninterested readers. Other information is available in the alt-text, surrounding context, and rest of the caption; a blind reader who got the necessary information should only have to expand the transcript if they're interested enough. Having an unusually long caption seems like a small price to pay.
<figure>
<figcaption>