1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one synced 2024-11-27 14:12:09 +00:00

Gemtext fixes

- Add link text
- Remove extraneous line break
This commit is contained in:
Rohan Kumar 2021-01-17 13:37:16 -08:00
parent 0085518b41
commit 4ed4e495f2
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 1E892DB2A5F84479

View file

@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ A brute-force attack that executes 2ⁿ guesses is certain to crack a password w
For scale, AES-256 encryption is currently the industry standard for strong symmetric encryption, and uses key lengths of 256-bits. An exhaustive key search over a 256-bit key space would be up against its 2²⁵⁶ possible permutations.
=> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Encryption_Standard
=> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Encryption_Standard Advanced Encryption Standard (Wikipedia)
To calculate the entropy of a password, I recommend using a tool such as zxcvbn or KeePassXC.
@ -146,8 +146,7 @@ Where G is the Gravitational Constant and Hₒ is the Hubble Constant. Hₒd is
=> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_constant Gravitational constant (Wikipedia)
=> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubble%27s_law Hubble's Law (Wikipedia)
Let's assume the observable universe is a sphere, expanding at the speed of light ever since the
Big Bang.⁴ The volume V of our spherical universe when given its radius r is:
Let's assume the observable universe is a sphere, expanding at the speed of light ever since the Big Bang.⁴ The volume V of our spherical universe when given its radius r is:
```
V = (4/3)πr³
@ -276,7 +275,7 @@ One well-known approach to calculating physical limits of computation is Bremerm
A publication⁵ by Seth Lloyd from MIT further explores limits to computation speed on an ideal 1-kilogram computer:
=> https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9908043
=> https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9908043 Ultimate physical limits to computation
## Acknowledgements
@ -286,7 +285,7 @@ My notes from Thermal Physics weren't enough to write this; various Wikipedia ar
While I was struggling to come up with a good expression for the minimum energy used per password guess, I stumbled upon a blog post by Bruce Schneier. It contained a useful excerpt from his book *Applied Cryptography*⁶ involving setting the minimum energy per computation to kT:
=> https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/09/the_doghouse_cr.html
=> https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/09/the_doghouse_cr.html The Doghouse: Crypteto (Schneier on Security)
I chose a more conservative estimate for T than Schneier did, and a *much* greater source of energy.