mirror of
https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one
synced 2024-11-27 14:12:09 +00:00
New nore: "Demise of DTDs".
This commit is contained in:
parent
3c4d8381fd
commit
48a9088ca1
1 changed files with 12 additions and 0 deletions
12
content/notes/demise-of-dtds.md
Normal file
12
content/notes/demise-of-dtds.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
title: "Demise of DTDs"
|
||||||
|
date: 2022-06-08T00:13:46-07:00
|
||||||
|
replyURI: "https://hackers.town/@theruran/108440475936938471"
|
||||||
|
replyTitle: "ever looked into writing your own DTD?"
|
||||||
|
replyType: "SocialMediaPosting"
|
||||||
|
replyAuthor: "theruran"
|
||||||
|
replyAuthorURI: "https://hackers.town/@theruran"
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
People have mostly moved on from DTDs. In HTML-land, they use the Living Standard; in XML land, they stick to boring existing parsing rules and use XML namespaces. In both, they use RDF vocabularies to describe RDF-based structured data.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I'm curious as to why you're interested in creating a new DTD. I think that unless you plan on creating a new SGML-based language, you're better served by namespaces.
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue