fmaury/seirdy.one
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one synced 2024-11-24 05:02:10 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

New note: callout semantics

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Rohan Kumar 2023-08-29 22:54:38 -07:00
parent 25684aa384
commit 3e61193a66
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 1E892DB2A5F84479
1 changed files with 17 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

17
content/notes/thoughts-on-callout-semantics.md Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
---
title: "Thoughts on callout semantics"
date: 2023-08-29T22:54:38-07:00
replyURI: "https://toast.al/posts/softwarecraft/2023-08-29_semantic-markup-for-callouts"
replyTitle: "Semantic Markup for Callouts: A Not-Quite-RFC for Admonitions in HTML"
replyType: "BlogPosting"
replyAuthor: "toastal"
replyAuthorURI: "https://toast.al"
---
Interesting proposal! Some thoughts:
- I'd suggest looking into the `doc-notice`, `doc-tip`, and `doc-example` [DPUB-ARIA](https://w3c.github.io/dpub-aria/) roles. I'm a big fan of DPUB-ARIA and I do not think it is used enough. I believe Google's Talkback has the most robust support for it put of any AT I'm familiar with.
- I'm not convinced that a `cot` element is necessary. I think a heading with `aria-labelledby` would work better as a way to name a callout, and an attribute (or DPUB-ARIA role) could better specify the type of callout.
Funnily enough, I'm thinking about my own proposal for a `spoiler` element which also has similar structure to—but different semantics from—the `details` element.