Link to MOAC in blog post

content/posts/password-strength.gmi

@@ -4,6 +4,10 @@ This is a tale of the intersection between thermal physics, cosmology, and a tin
 
 Note: this post contains equations. Since none of the equations were long or complex, I decided to just write them out in code blocks instead of using images or MathML the way Wikipedia does.
 
+Update: I implemented the ideas in this blog post (and more) in a program/library:
+
+=> https://sr.ht/~seirdy/MOAC/ MOAC: Analyze and generate passwords using physical limits of computation
+
 ## Introduction
 
 I realize that advice on password strength can get outdated. As supercomputers grow more powerful, password strength recommendations need to be updated to resist stronger brute-force attacks. Passwords that are strong today might be weak in the future. How long should a password be in order for it to be physically impossible to brute-force, ever?

content/posts/password-strength.md

@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
 ---
 date: "2021-01-12T00:03:10-08:00"
-description: Using thermal physics, cosmology, and computer science to calculate password
-    vulnerability to the biggest possible brute-force attack.
+description: Using thermal physics, cosmology, and computer science to calculate password vulnerability to the biggest possible brute-force attack.
 outputs:
     - html
     - gemtext
@@ -17,6 +16,8 @@ This is a tale of the intersection between thermal physics, cosmology, and a tin
 
 _Note: this post contains equations. Since none of the equations were long or complex, I decided to just write them out in code blocks instead of using images or MathML the way Wikipedia does._
 
+_Update: I implemented the ideas in this blog post (and more) in a program/library, [MOAC](https://sr.ht/~seirdy/MOAC/)_
+
 Introduction
 ------------
 
@@ -260,3 +261,4 @@ While I was struggling to come up with a good expression for the minimum energy
 
 [^6]: Schneier, Bruce. Applied Cryptography, Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, 1996.
 
+