mirror of
https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one
synced 2024-11-10 00:12:09 +00:00
New note: caveats to Ungoogled Chromium recommendations
This commit is contained in:
parent
b07f06e009
commit
246c80a7e2
1 changed files with 20 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
title: "Caveats to Ungoogled Chromium recommendations"
|
||||||
|
date: 2024-07-15T00:05:38-04:00
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
In the wake of a certain ad-funded browser company bundling adtech into its browser yet again, some people have been recommending Ungoogled-Chromium (<abbr>UGC</abbr>). I think it's fine to recommend <abbr>UGC</abbr> _with caveats,_ such as the fact that it disables component updates that include:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Certificate revocation. Chromium uses [downloaded CRLSets](https://www.chromium.org/Home/chromium-security/crlsets/) for revocation; it does not support OCSP.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Out of band security patches. When browser components have exploits in the wild, they need to be patched ASAP; updating billions of installations within time-frames measured in hours often means restartless out-of-band updates.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Out of band certificate bundle updates.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
If you assume Google uses its component update server logs maliciously, you may wish to consider a fork that still offers component updates provided by a different party's servers.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<abbr title="Ungoogled Chromium">UGC</abbr> disabled mDNS at one point. This exposed local IP addresses over WebRTC for years, but they seem to have shipped a fix in May 2023 to disable non-proxied UDP.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<abbr>UGC</abbr> also disables the Chrome Web Store in favor of installing extensions out of band. Make sure you regularly update your extensions installed out-of-band, since <abbr>UGC</abbr> won't do it on its own. Some scripts and a special extension re-implement some of this functionality.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Overall, <abbr>UGC</abbr> is still safer than QtWebEngine despite making heavy compromises to security for privacy (though I can't see how either benefited from disabling mDNS: I'm not aware of threat models under which revealing a local IP to every application is preferable to revealing it to just Google). Running <abbr>UGC</abbr> is fine if you understand these trade-offs and have accounted for them. I use it in headless mode to run accessibility and performance tests.
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue