mirror of
https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one
synced 2024-11-10 00:12:09 +00:00
18 lines
1.1 KiB
Markdown
18 lines
1.1 KiB
Markdown
|
---
|
||
|
|
title: "Limited tracking and consent"
|
||
|
|
date: 2022-09-24T11:28:34-07:00
|
||
|
|
replyURI: "https://indieweb.social/@Chronotope/109054613809239268"
|
||
|
|
replyTitle: "if the initial collection is very limited it doesn't run afoul of the issues that should require consent"
|
||
|
|
replyType: "SocialMediaPosting"
|
||
|
|
replyAuthor: "Aram Zucker-Scharff"
|
||
|
|
replyAuthorURI: "https://aramzs.github.io/aramzs/"
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Assuming data is a liability, how limited should data collection be to not require consent?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
I think temporary storage (a week or less) of access logs combined with low-entropy binary information (dark mode, is viewport narrower than what I test with, etc) is reasonable for a small operation. This holds if the data collection is clearly documented in a privacy policy, is Tor-friendly, and obeys signals like GPC. These access logs should exclude high-entropy headers like client hints.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Larger operations should store even less since they have the means to correlate information from many sources. [ipscrub](https://github.com/masonicboom/ipscrub) comes to mind.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The only long-term storage that should happen without consent is of bot traffic.
|