seirdy.one/content/notes/yuescript-first-impressions.md

---
title: "Yuescript first impressions"
date: 2023-02-15T09:35:15-08:00
syndicatedCopies:
    - title: 'The Fediverse'
      url: 'https://pleroma.envs.net/notice/ASi7iC9E0WfUIObg5A'
---
I just discovered [Yuescript](https://yuescript.org/doc/), which is like MoonScript with more features. I have mixed feelings.

I like features like pipelines (much cleaner than repeated assignment or nested parentheses in function calls) and compile-time macros. The sugar for multiple and destructuring assignment is handy.

I find the additional operators unnecessary, and not worth their cognitive overhead. The `?` operator was already used as sugar for a parameter-free function call. The `[]` operator could easily have been a function in a library instead.

One of the trade-offs for this much syntactic sugar is some syntactic ambiguity. An opinionated formatter could resolve some of this.
New note: Yuescript first impressions 2023-02-15 17:35:15 +00:00			`---`
			`title: "Yuescript first impressions"`
			`date: 2023-02-15T09:35:15-08:00`
syndicate 2023-02-15 17:36:28 +00:00			`syndicatedCopies:`
			`- title: 'The Fediverse'`
			`url: 'https://pleroma.envs.net/notice/ASi7iC9E0WfUIObg5A'`
New note: Yuescript first impressions 2023-02-15 17:35:15 +00:00			`---`
			`I just discovered [Yuescript](https://yuescript.org/doc/), which is like MoonScript with more features. I have mixed feelings.`

			`I like features like pipelines (much cleaner than repeated assignment or nested parentheses in function calls) and compile-time macros. The sugar for multiple and destructuring assignment is handy.`

			I find the additional operators unnecessary, and not worth their cognitive overhead. The `?` operator was already used as sugar for a parameter-free function call. The `[]` operator could easily have been a function in a library instead.

			`One of the trade-offs for this much syntactic sugar is some syntactic ambiguity. An opinionated formatter could resolve some of this.`