mirror of
https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one
synced 2024-11-14 01:32:11 +00:00
23 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
23 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
|
---
|
|||
|
title: "Welcome to the IndieWeb"
|
|||
|
date: 2022-06-20T14:30:24-07:00
|
|||
|
replyURI: "https://www.miriamsuzanne.com/2022/06/04/indiweb/"
|
|||
|
replyTitle: "Am I on the IndieWeb Yet?"
|
|||
|
replyType: "BlogPosting"
|
|||
|
replyAuthor: "Miriam Suzanne"
|
|||
|
replyAuthorURI: "https://www.miriamsuzanne.com/who/"
|
|||
|
---
|
|||
|
Welcome to the IndieWeb, Miriam!
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
> I've struggled to categorize what on my wite is a "post" worth syndicating vs a "page" vs ???
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I had this struggle too, and solved it with per-section and combined feeds. [My combined feed](https://seirdy.one/atom.xml) contains every page on my site that includes a publication date in its metadata; my sections for articles and notes have their own respective feeds.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
> If I want live updates (this is a static site) there’s still more to learn.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Remember that pretty much all IndieWeb features are optional. You only have to implement what interests you. You can get really far when it comes to bringing a static site to the IndieWeb, so I'd suggest against jumping onto a dynamic site immediately.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
You can also push live updates using WebSub. Your main site can still be static, but you can pint a (first- or third-party) WebSub hub to push content as soon as you update your site. I plan on using this approach soon.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I like the "static site with ancillary services" model: it keeps the core fast and simple, and makes extra modules easy to add and replace.
|