This is a cursory review of all the indexing search engines I have been able to find. Gemini engines are at the bottom; the rest of this post is about Web search engines. The three dominant English search engines with their own indexes¹ are Google, Bing, and Yandex (GBY). Many alternatives to GBY exist, but almost none of them have their own results; instead, they just source their results from GBY. With that in mind, I decided to test and catalog all the different indexing search engines I could find. I prioritized breadth over depth, and encourage readers to try the engines out themselves if they’d like more information. I primarily evaluated English-speaking search engines because that’s my primary language. With some difficulty, I could probably evaluate a Spanish one; however, I wasn’t able to find many Spanish-language engines powered by their own crawlers. This page is a “living document” that I plan on updating indefinitely. Check for updates once in a while if you find this page interesting. Feel free to send me suggestions, updates, and corrections; I’d especially appreciate help from those who speak languages besides English and can evaluate a non-English indexing search engine. Contact info is in the article footer. ## Methodology I mainly evaluated link results, and didn’t focus too much on (often glaring) privacy issues, “enhanced” or “instant” results (e.g. Wikipedia sidebars, related searches, StackExchange answers), or other elements. I compared results for esoteric queries side-by-side; if the first 20 results were (nearly) identical to another engine’s results (though perhaps in a slightly different order), they were likely sourced externally and not from an independent index. I tried to pick queries that should have a good number of results and show variance between search engines. An incomplete selection of queries I tested: * “vim”, “emacs”, “neovim”, and “nvimrc”: Search engines with relevant results for “nvimrc” typically have a big index. Finding relevant results for the text editors “vim” and “emacs” instead of other topics that share the name is a challenging task. * “vim cleaner”: should return results related to a line of cleaning products rather than the Correct Text Editor. * “Seirdy”: My site is relatively low-traffic, but my nickname is pretty unique and visible on several of the highest-traffic sites out there. * “Project London”: a small movie made with volunteers and FLOSS without much advertising. If links related to the movie show up, the engine’s really good. * “oppenheimer”: a name that could refer to many things. Without context, it should refer to the physicist who worked on the atomic bomb in Los Alamos. Other historical queries: “magna carta” (intermediate), “the prince” (very hard). ## General indexing search-engines ### Large indexes, good results These are large engines that pass all the above tests and more. 1. Google: the biggest index. Allows submitting pages and sitemaps for crawling, but requires login. Powers a few other engines: * Startpage * Runnaroo * SAPO (Portuguese interface, can work with English results) 2. Bing: the runner-up. Allows submitting pages and sitemaps for crawling, but requires login. Its index powers many other engines: * Yahoo * DuckDuckGo² * AOL * Qwant³ * Ecosia * Ekoru * Privado * Findx * Disconnect Search⁴ * PrivacyWall * Lilo * SearchScene * Peekier * Oscobo * Million Short * Yippy search⁵ * Lycos * Givero * Swisscows * Ask.moe⁶ * Partially powers MetaGer by default; this can be turned off * At this point, I stopped adding Bing-based search engines. There are just too many. 3. Yandex: originally a Russian search engine, it now has an English version. Some Russian results bleed into its English site. Allows submitting pages and sitemaps for crawling, but requires login. Powers: * Epic Search * Occasionally powers DuckDuckGo’s link results instead of Bing. 4. Mojeek: Claims to be privacy-oriented. Quality isn’t at Google/Bing/Yandex’s level, but it’s not bad either. If I had to use Mojeek as my default general search engine, I’d live. 5. Petal search: gopetal.com and petalsearch.com. A very new engine developed by Huawei. Surprisingly good results; it passed all the listed tests. Requires an account to submit sites. I discovered this via my access logs. => https://www.gopetal.com/ gopetal.com => https://petalsearch.com/ petalsearch.com ### Smaller indexes, relevant results These engines pass most of the tests listed in the “methodology” section. * Right Dao : very fast, good results. Passes the tests fairly well. * Gigablast : It’s been around for a while and also sports a classic web directory. Searches are a bit slow, and it charges to submit sites for crawling. It powers Private.sh. Gigablast is tied with Right Dao for quality. * Gowiki : Very young, small index, but shows promise. I discovered this in the seirdy.one access logs. Currently only available in the US. => https://rightdao.com Right Dao => http://gigablast.com/ Gigablast => https://private.sh Private.sh => https://gowiki.com Gowiki ### Smaller indexes, hit-and-miss These engines fail badly at a few important tests. * seekport : The interface is in German but it supports searching in English just fine. The default language is selected by your locale. It’s really good considering its small index; it hasn’t heard of less common terms (e.g. “Seirdy”), but it’s able to find relevant results in other tests. * Exalead : slow, quality is hit-and-miss. Its indexer claims to crawl the DMOZ directory, which has since shut down and been replaced by the Curlie directory. No relevant results for “Oppenheimer” and some other history-related queries. Allows submitting individual URLs for indexing, but requires solving a Google reCAPTCHA and entering an email address. * wbsrch : In addition to its generalist search, it also has many other utilities related to domain name statistics. Failed multiple tests. Its index is a bit dated; it has an old backlog of sites it hasn’t finished indexing. It also has several dedicated per-language indexes. * ExactSeek : small index, disproportionately dominated by big sites. Failed multiple tests. Allows submitting individual URLs for crawling, but requires entering an email address and receiving a newsletter. Webmaster tools seem to heavily push for paid SEO options. * Meorca: A UK-based search engine that claims not to "index pornography or illegal content websites". It also features a public blog with a marketplace and free games. Allows submitting URLs, but requires a full name, email, phone number, and "business name" to do so. Discovered in the seirdy.one access logs. => http://www.seekport.com/ seekport => http://www.exalead.com/search/ Exalead => https://curlie.org Curlie => https://wbsrch.com/ wbsrch => https://www.exactseek.com/ ExactSeek => https://meorca.com/ Meorca Search Engine ### Unusable engines, irrelevant results Results from these search engines don’t seem at all useful. * YaCy: community-made index; slow. Results are awful/irrelevant, but can be useful for intranet or custom search. * Scopia: only seems to be available via the MetaGer metasearch engine after turning off Bing and news results. Tiny index, very low-quality. * Active Search Results : very poor quality * Crawlson: young, slow. In this category because its index has a cap of 10 urls per domain. I initially discovered Crawlson in the seirdy.one access logs. The site seems to be down right now, so I didn’t link it. => https://metager.org MetaGer => https://www.activesearchresults.com Active Search Results ## Non-generalist search These indexing search engines don’t have a Google-like “ask me anything” endgame; they’re trying to do something different. * Wiby: I love this one. It focuses on smaller independent sites that capture the spirit of the “early” web. It’s more focused on “discovering” new interesting pages that match a set of keywords than finding a specific resources. I like to think of Wiby as an engine for surfing, not searching. Runnaroo occasionally features a hit from Wiby. If you have a small site or blog that isn’t very “commercial”, consider submitting it to the index. * Search My Site: Similar to Wiby, but only indexes user-submitted personal and independent sites. It optionally supports IndieAuth. * Quor: seems to mainly index large news sites. => https://wiby.me wiby.me => https://wiby.org wiby.org => https://searchmysite.net Search My site => https://www.quor.com Quor ## Other languages I’m unable to evaluate these engines properly since I don’t speak the necessary languages. English searches on these are a hit-or-miss. I might have made a few mistakes in this category. ### Big indexes * Baidu: Chinese * Qihoo 360: Chinese. I’m not sure how independent this one is. * Sogou: Chinese * Yisou: Chinese * Naver: Korean. * Seznam: Czech, seems relatively privacy-friendly. Discovered in the seirdy.one access logs. * Cốc Cốc: Vietnamese => https://search.naver.com Naver => https://www.seznam.cz/ Seznam => https://coccoc.com/search Cốc Cốc ### Smaller indexes * Parsijoo: Persian * search.ch: Regional search engine for Switzerland; users can restrict searches to their local regions. * fastbot: German * Moose.at: German (Austria-based) => http://www.parsijoo.ir/ Parsijoo => https://search.ch search.ch => https://www.fastbot.de/ fastbot => https://www.moose.at Moose.at ## Misc * Ask.com: the main site shut down, but subdomains like uk.ask.com are still alive. They claim to outsource search results. The results seem similar to Google, Bing, and Yandex; however, I can’t pinpoint exactly where their results are coming from. * Not evaluated: Apple’s search. It’s only accessible through a search widget in iOS and macOS and shows very few results. This might change; see the next section. * Partially evaluated: Infinity Search young, small index. It recently split into a paid offering with the main index and Infinity Decentralized, the latter of which allows users to select from community-hosted crawlers. I managed to try it out before it became a paid offering, and it seemed decent; however, I wasn’t able to run the tests listed in the “Methodology” section. Allows submitting URLs and sitemaps into a text box, no other work required. => https://uk.ask.com uk.ask.com => https://infinitysearch.co Infinity Search => https://infinitydecentralized.com/ Infinity Decentralized ## Upcoming engines These engines aren’t ready yet; their indexes are either in a proof-of-concept phase with a handful of sites, or aren’t available yet. * Apple: given the activity of the AppleBot crawler lately, their index will almost certainly grow to a size large enough to power a general search engine soon. Check your server’s access logs; there’s a good chance it’s crawled your site if you have a few backlinks. * Brave announced that it will start its own independent search engine based on the now-discontinued Cliqz. I don’t endorse the company, but I hope its results will be available through metasearch engines like Searx. => https://brave.com/search/ Brave Search ## Gemini search engines Time for my first Gemini-exclusive content! A Gemini page about search engines wouldn't be complete without a few search engines for the Gemini space. * gus.guru: the original Gemini search engine. The index doesn't seem to be updated anymore. * geminispace.info: Another instance of GUS, but with an updated index. => gemini://gus.guru/ gus.guru => gemini://geminispace.info/ geminispace.info ## Acknowledgements Some of this content came from the Search Engine Map and Search Engine Party. A few web directories also proved useful. => https://www.searchenginemap.com/ Search Engine Map => https://searchengine.party/ Search Engine Party ## Notes ¹ Yes, “indexes” is an acceptable plural form of the word “index”. The word “indices” sounds weird to me outside a math class. ² DuckDuckGo has a crawler called DuckDuckBot. This crawler doesn’t impact the linked results displayed; it just grabs favicons and scrapes data for a few instant answers ³ Qwant claims to also use its own crawler for results, but it’s still mostly Bing. Try a side-by-side comparison; I found that it doesn’t seem to have anything besides Bing results. ⁴ Disconnect Search allows users to have results proxied from Bing or Yahoo, but Yahoo sources its results from Bing. ⁵ Yippy claims to be powered by a certain IBM brand (a brand that could correspond to any number of products) and annotates results with the phrase “Yippy Index”, but a side-by-side comparison with Bing and other Bing-based engines revealed results to be nearly identical. ⁶ Ask.moe was working on a FLOSS indexer; its search page stated an intention to switch to it from Bing at one point. This statement has since been removed. => https://git.sr.ht/~danskeren/spider.moe FLOSS indexer