fmaury/seirdy.one
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one synced 2024-11-23 21:02:09 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Compare commits

base: fmaury:d5b19a0d72e56e0c92744b237ce39da1fbc3a5ce
Branches Tags
fmaury:master
fmaury:draft-searchengines
..
compare: fmaury:99264641f3e93650b9ff8e5abc38ba3e62d22eb0
Branches Tags
fmaury:master
fmaury:draft-searchengines

No commits in common. "d5b19a0d72e56e0c92744b237ce39da1fbc3a5ce" and "99264641f3e93650b9ff8e5abc38ba3e62d22eb0" have entirely different histories.
d5b19a0d72 ... 99264641f3

2 changed files with 0 additions and 28 deletions
Show stats Expand all files Collapse all files

18
content/notes/better-vote-enabled-forums.md
View file

@ -1,18 +0,0 @@
---
title: "Better vote-enabled forums"
date: 2022-06-14T10:53:12-07:00
description: 'Armchair speculation: how we can learn from Redit, Lemmy, "Hacker" "News", et al to build forums for discussion rather than validation and attention-seeking.'
---
Armchair speculation: how can we learn from Reddit, Lemmy, "Hacker" "News", et al?
1. A vote should be part of a reply with at least <var>N</var> words. <var>N</var> could be increased by mods and admins. Instances could federate votes conditionally based on the length or activity of a comment. Word counts can be problematic; I don't know a better alternative (maybe clause-count?). Flagging doesn't need a minimum word count.
2. Forums shouldn't host their own top-level posts and comments. Those should be links from authors' own websites with microformats (think [IndieWeb](https://indieweb.org/)). The forum should be Webmention-enabled.
3. Larger communities should have ephemeral chatrooms ("ephemeral" in that public history has a retention limit if it exists at all) to incubate posts. Authors (yes, original authors) could share their work and collect feedback/improve it before it's "ready". They could then post with increased visibility.
4. One reason to flag a top-level comment could be "didn't look at the post". I say "look at" instead of "read" because certain posts are huge essays that could take hours to read. Top level commenters should at least be expected to skim.
These qualities will make a forum less active, since the quality of content will be higher and some validation and attention-seeking will be filtered out. Low activity means higher visibility for good content. Forums could "get of the ground" by starting invite-only, gradually enabling these rules one-by-one before opening to the public.
(psst: I might be working on "a thing").

10
content/notes/dillo-repository-mirror.md
View file

@ -1,10 +0,0 @@
---
title: "Dillo repository mirror"
date: 2022-06-14T13:45:31-07:00
---
Dillo's domain name has expired, making it impossible to fetch its Mercurial repository from its canonical location. Fortunately, Mercurial is a distributed version control system, and I had a copy. [I pushed my copy to hg.sr.ht](https://hg.sr.ht/~seirdy/dillo-mirror); you can see it there.
The Wayback Machine also has [recent snapshots of dillo.org from May.](https://web.archive.org/web/20220511073123/https://www.dillo.org/)
I imagine that at least a few people have copies of the mailing list archives.