1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/seirdy.one synced 2024-11-23 21:02:09 +00:00

Compare commits

...

2 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Rohan Kumar
2c133b1870
New note: alternative textual browsers 2022-08-06 19:00:12 -07:00
Rohan Kumar
586d201749
Cite HGOM for more on stylometric fingerprinting 2022-08-06 16:18:08 -07:00
3 changed files with 15 additions and 0 deletions

View file

@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
---
title: "Alternative textual browsers"
date: 2022-08-06T19:00:03-07:00
---
I've used [many textual browsers]({{<relref "/meta/site-design.md#compatibility-statement">}}), but I'm interested in more hardened options. Browsers parse untrusted content from the Internet but no textual browsers employ sandboxing, continuous fuzzing, or other security measures. Check CVEs for Lynx or w3m and you'll see what I mean.
I'm also looking at alternatives to [my w3m-sandbox script](https://git.sr.ht/~seirdy/bwrap-scripts/tree/trunk/item/w3m-sandbox) to show HTML emails. Pandoc with `commonmark-raw_html` output is an option; Haskell seems like a better choice than un-fuzzed C for this. I'd like a more battle-hardened library for networking, like libcurl (used in Edbrowse).
I considered [Offpunk](https://notabug.org/ploum/offpunk), which uses Readability to extract articles. I'd rather pipe [rdrview](https://github.com/eafer/rdrview) output to w3m-sandbox. rdrview does some sandboxing, and sanitizes input to a subset of HTML.

View file

@ -154,4 +154,7 @@ If you wish to write anonymously, I recommend the following:
5. If, after doing the prior steps, your anonymous work still has a reading level too similar to your non-anonymous writing: reduce the reading level by choosing simpler words.
More information about stylometric fingerprinting resistance is on the Hitchiker's Guide to Online Anonymity:
=> https://anonymousplanet-ng.org/guide.html#appendix-a4-counteracting-forensic-linguistics HGOA Appendix A4: counteracting forensic linguistics
Stay safe, everyone.

View file

@ -174,6 +174,8 @@ If you wish to write anonymously, I recommend the following:
5. If, after doing the prior steps, your anonymous work still has a reading level too similar to your non-anonymous writing: reduce the reading level by choosing simpler words.
More information on stylometric fingerprinting resistance is on {{<mention-work itemtype="TechArticle" itemprop="citation">}}{{<cited-work name="The Hitchiker's Guide to Online Anonymity" extraName="headline" url="https://anonymousplanet-ng.org/guide.html#appendix-a4-counteracting-forensic-linguistics">}}{{</mention-work>}}.
Stay safe, everyone.
</section>