From f652cad5af1076523e475779975383d61163248b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Seirdy <seirdy@seirdy.one>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:39:41 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] syndicate

---
 content/notes/loseable-keys-are-a-feature.md | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/content/notes/loseable-keys-are-a-feature.md b/content/notes/loseable-keys-are-a-feature.md
index 7605f89..8113610 100644
--- a/content/notes/loseable-keys-are-a-feature.md
+++ b/content/notes/loseable-keys-are-a-feature.md
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
 ---
 title: "Lose-able keys are a feature"
 date: 2024-09-12T20:30:14-04:00
-#syndicatedCopies:
-#    - title: 'The Fediverse'
-#      url: ''
-#    - title: 'Bluesky'
-#      url: ''
+syndicatedCopies:
+    - title: 'The Fediverse'
+      url: 'https://pleroma.envs.net/objects/5109b99d-e817-4f79-b9a4-8fe1293e3900'
+    - title: 'Bluesky'
+      url: 'https://bsky.app/profile/seirdy.one/post/3l3yptx6w4l22'
 ---
 In opsec, [duress ("rubber-hose") attacks are famously hard to address](https://xkcd.com/538/). Cryptographic keys that cannot be lost have poor protections against duress.