From df4da9b2d57d2bffdd151b507676c9282bc20531 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rohan Kumar Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 19:46:24 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] New note: DoH in Android --- content/notes/doh-in-android.md | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) create mode 100644 content/notes/doh-in-android.md diff --git a/content/notes/doh-in-android.md b/content/notes/doh-in-android.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f61f4a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/content/notes/doh-in-android.md @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +--- +title: "DoH in Android" +date: 2022-07-20T19:46:29-07:00 +replyURI: "https://vulpine.club/@KitRedgrave/108682844888729785" +replyTitle: "Thread on concerns about DoH in Android" +replyType: "SocialMediaPosting" +replyAuthor: "vx. redgrave" +replyAuthorURI: "https://vulpine.club/@KitRedgrave" +--- +IMO: the main benefit of DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) is that it's a stepping stone to [Oblivious DNS over HTTPS (RFC 9230)](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9230.html). + +> i distrust how much more this encourages centralization + +I don't see how it's more centralized than DNS-over-TLS (DoT). On the client side, QUIC is already present on just about every Android phone. + +On the server side: I don't think this update forces you to use any given provider, nor does it remove DoT. The default provider is whatever your phone vendor puts in (otherwise the default is Google DNS, just like before). They're even adding DDR so you can switch to DoT if your preferred resolver doesn't support DoH. +