From dea7ebf05a6c8d140aa55c4e05027131a4851bd7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Seirdy Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 00:15:10 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] syndicate --- .../notes/caveats-to-ungoogled-chromium-recommendations.md | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/content/notes/caveats-to-ungoogled-chromium-recommendations.md b/content/notes/caveats-to-ungoogled-chromium-recommendations.md index e47f317..8367ecc 100644 --- a/content/notes/caveats-to-ungoogled-chromium-recommendations.md +++ b/content/notes/caveats-to-ungoogled-chromium-recommendations.md @@ -1,6 +1,11 @@ --- title: "Caveats to Ungoogled Chromium recommendations" date: 2024-07-15T00:05:38-04:00 +syndicatedCopies: + - title: 'The Fediverse' + url: 'https://pleroma.envs.net/objects/b4de6133-3e88-448a-a795-874d285e56da' + - title: 'jstpst' + url: 'https://jstpst.net/f/technology/10291/caveats-to-ungoogled-chromium-recommendations' --- In the wake of a certain ad-funded browser company bundling adtech into its browser yet again, some people have been recommending Ungoogled-Chromium (UGC). I think it's fine to recommend UGC _with caveats,_ such as the fact that it disables component updates that include: