From b95468a93a57d4ca468010bdd670f79ed25c2bcc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rohan Kumar <seirdy@seirdy.one>
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 15:06:35 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] punctuation and syndication

---
 .../notes/regex-feature-creep-considered-non-harmful.md   | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/content/notes/regex-feature-creep-considered-non-harmful.md b/content/notes/regex-feature-creep-considered-non-harmful.md
index 2687d32..48b765d 100644
--- a/content/notes/regex-feature-creep-considered-non-harmful.md
+++ b/content/notes/regex-feature-creep-considered-non-harmful.md
@@ -6,11 +6,11 @@ replyTitle: "“regular” expressions"
 replyType: "SocialMediaPosting"
 replyAuthor: "Chjara"
 replyAuthorURI: "https://tuxcrafting.online/"
-#syndicatedCopies:
-#    - title: 'The Fediverse'
-#      url: ''
+syndicatedCopies:
+    - title: 'The Fediverse'
+      url: 'https://pleroma.envs.net/notice/AZ8TzJQpYkHFYzw0CO'
 ---
 De-facto standard extensions for recursion and variable-length look-arounds have existed for ages; the word "regular" in most regular-expression engines is there for historical reasons. I first read about this in {{<mention-work itemtype="TechArticle">}}{{<cited-work name="Apocalypse 5: Pattern Matching" extraName="headline" url="https://raku.org/archive/doc/design/apo/A05.html">}} by {{<indieweb-person itemprop="author" first-name="Larry" last-name="Wall" url="http://www.wall.org/~larry/">}}{{</mention-work>}} (he loves his biblical terminology).
 
-I _would_ like to just use Raku rules for a concise way to describe more advanced grammars; I'd then just keep my regexes to the PCRE subset that's common between Google's RE2 and the Rust regex crate; I doubt they're both "regular" but both guarantee linear time matching. Part of the reason I don't do this is portability. Not everything runs Raku, but almost every platform has [a regex engine with the features I need](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_regular_expression_engines).
+I _would_ like to just use Raku rules for a concise way to describe more advanced grammars; I'd then just keep my regexes to the PCRE subset that's common between Google's RE2 and the Rust regex crate. I doubt they're both "regular" but both guarantee linear time matching. Part of the reason I don't do this is portability. Not everything runs Raku, but almost every platform has [a regex engine with the features I need](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_regular_expression_engines).