From 8f29201ae3c3b96ad8667143dad31cb7aeee000e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rohan Kumar Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 09:55:15 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Mention Gitea's ActivityPub work. --- content/notes/give-up-github.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/content/notes/give-up-github.md b/content/notes/give-up-github.md index d78575a..749203b 100644 --- a/content/notes/give-up-github.md +++ b/content/notes/give-up-github.md @@ -22,5 +22,5 @@ Some things I think you should consider adding: - Notes on CI solutions. While SourceHut and GitLab provide excellent CI, Gitea does not. Codeberg offers CI in the form of Woodpecker CI. I don't know how good Woodpecker is from an accessibility perspective, but Sourcehut's "builds" service is excellent. -- Notes on measures taken by forges to escape vendor lock-in through the network effect (I like to call this ["user domestication"]({{}})). Sourcehut uses mailing lists and does not require making an account. +- Notes on measures taken by forges to escape vendor lock-in through the network effect (I like to call this ["user domestication"]({{}})). Sourcehut uses mailing lists and does not require making an account; Gitea is working on ActivityPub-based federation.