From 8ed8a405f4da15511dcca30554ed11bc5d82e740 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rohan Kumar Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 17:27:14 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Add page with details on WCAG conformance --- content/meta/site-design.md | 6 +- content/meta/wcag-conformance.md | 313 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 314 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) create mode 100644 content/meta/wcag-conformance.md diff --git a/content/meta/site-design.md b/content/meta/site-design.md index 7ea5da9..48c388c 100644 --- a/content/meta/site-design.md +++ b/content/meta/site-design.md @@ -24,10 +24,6 @@ The [Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG)](https://www.w3.org/WAI/standar Additionally, I strive to conform to WCAG 2.2 level AAA wherever applicable. I comply with all AAA criteria except for the following: - -SC 1.4.8 Visual Presentation -: I am in partial compliance with this criterion. Long article body text for articles should conform; with default browser fonts, they have an average character count per line below 80 characters. However, some lines may occasionally exceed this limit. Text outside of long article bodies has a longer line width, though. - SC 2.4.9 Link Purpose (Link Only) : I'm actually trying to follow this criterion, but it's a work in progress. Let me know if any link names can be improved! Link purpose _in context_ always makes sense. @@ -37,7 +33,7 @@ SC 3.1.5 Reading Level SC 3.1.6 Pronunciation : I do not yet provide any pronunciation information. -I have only tested WCAG compliance in mainstream browser engines (Blink, Gecko, WebKit). +I have only tested WCAG compliance in mainstream browser engines (Blink, Gecko, WebKit). Full details on how I meet every WCAG success criterion are on a separate page: [Details on WCAG 2.2 conformance](../wcag-conformance/) I also go further than WCAG in many aspects: diff --git a/content/meta/wcag-conformance.md b/content/meta/wcag-conformance.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9d85c42 --- /dev/null +++ b/content/meta/wcag-conformance.md @@ -0,0 +1,313 @@ +--- +outputs: + - html +title: "Details on WCAG 2.2 conformance" +description: "Every WCAG 2.2 success criterion, and how seirdy.one achieves it. I list techniques I used and areas for improvement. This page is a work in progress." +date: "2022-07-11T16:13:00-07:00" +evergreen: true +--- +I made full conformance with the AA level and partial conformance with AAA a goal in my site's accessibility statement. + +I use the following abbreviations: + + +SC +: Success criterion. A requirement listed in the WCAG. + +ST +: Sufficient technique; a technique that meets a given success criterion. + +{{}} + +Principle 1: Perceivable +------------------------ + +### Guideline 1.1: Text Alternatives + + +[SC 1.1.1: Non-Text Content](https://w3c.github.io/wcag/understanding/non-text-content.html) +: All non-text content on my site has a text alternative. Images have alt-text ([ST H37](https://w3c.github.io/wcag/techniques/html/H37)). I provide image and audio transcripts using `aria-describedby` when relevant ([ST ARIA15](https://w3c.github.io/wcag/techniques/aria/ARIA15) and [ST G74](https://w3c.github.io/wcag/techniques/general/G74)). Form controls have `